Tag Archives: film forum

EMBRACE OF THE SERPENT

EMBRACE OF THE SERPENT

EMBRACE OF THE SERPENT takes viewers on an extraordinary journey into the heart of darkness and beyond

EMBRACE OF THE SERPENT (EL ABRAZO DE LA SERPIENTE) (Ciro Guerra, 2015)
Film Forum, 209 West Houston St., 212-727-8110
Lincoln Plaza Cinema, 1886 Broadway at 63rd St., 212-757-2280
Opens Wednesday, February 17
embraceoftheserpent.oscilloscope.net

Colombian writer-director Ciro Guerra takes viewers on a spectacular journey through time and space and deep into the heart of darkness in the extraordinary Embrace of the Serpent. Guerra’s Oscar-nominated film, the first to be shot in the Colombian Amazon in thirty years, opens with a 1909 quote from explorer Theodor Koch-Grünberg: “It is not possible for me to know if the infinite jungle has started on me the process that has taken many others to complete and irremediable insanity.” Inspired by the real-life journals of Koch-Grünberg and botanist and explorer Richard Evans Schultes, Guerra poetically shifts back and forth between two similar trips down the Vaupés River, both led by the same Amazonian shaman, each time guiding a white scientist on a perilous expedition in a long, narrow canoe. Shortly after the turn of the twentieth century, ailing white ethnologist Theo (Jan Bijvoet) and his native aid, Manduca (Yauenkü Migue), seek the help of Karamakate (Nilbio Torres), a shaman wholly suspicious of whites and who believes he is the last of his tribe. However, Theo claims he knows where remnants of Karamakate’s people live and will show him in return for helping him find the magical and mysterious hallucinogenic Yakruna plant that Theo thinks can cure his illness. Forty years later, white botanist Evan (Brionne Davis) enlists Karamakate (Antonio Bolívar Salvador) to locate what is thought to be the last surviving Yakruna plant, which he hopes will finally allow him to dream in order to heal his soul. Evoking such films as Werner Herzog’s Fitzcarraldo and Aguirre, the Wrath of God and Francis Ford Coppola’s Apocalypse Now, Embrace of the Serpent makes the rainforest itself a character, shot in glorious black-and-white by David Gallego (Cecilia, Violencia) in a sparkling palette reminiscent of the work of Brazilian photographer Sebastião Salgado. As the parallel stories continue, the men encounter similar locations that have changed dramatically over time, largely as a result of rubber barons descending on the forest and white missionaries bringing Western religion to the natives. It’s difficult to watch without being assailed by imperialist concepts of the “noble savage,” mainly because the Amazon — and our Western minds — have been so profoundly affected by those ideas. “Before he can become a warrior, a man has to leave everything behind and go into the jungle, guided only by his dreams,” the older Karamakate says. “In that journey he has to discover, completely alone, who he really is.”

EMBRACE OF THE SERPENT

Guide Karamakate (Antonio Bolívar Salvador) and botanist Evan (Brionne Davis) explore dreams in Ciro Guerra’s EMBRACE OF THE SERPENT

Winner of the Directors’ Fortnight Art Cinema Award at the Cannes Film Festival and nominated for a Best Foreign Language Film Academy Award, Embrace of the Serpent is an unforgettable spiritual quest into the ravages of colonialism, the evils of materialism, the end of indigenous cultures, and what should be a sacred relationship between humanity and nature. Written by Guerra (2004’s Wandering Shadows, 2009’s The Wind Journeys) and Jacques Toulemonde (Anna), it is told from the point of view of the indigenous people of the Amazon, whom Guerra worked closely with in the making of the film, assuring them of his intentions to not exploit them the way so many others have. Aside from the Belgian Bijvoet and the Texan Davis, the rest of the cast is made up of members of tribes that live along the Vaupés. Guerra actually brought along a shaman known as a payé to perform ritual ceremonies to ensure the safety of the cast and crew and to protect the jungle itself. “What Ciro is doing with this film is an homage to the memory of our elders, in the time before: the way the white men treated the natives, the rubber exploitation,” Torres, in his first movie, says about the film. “I’ve asked the elders how it was and it is as seen in the film; that’s why we decided to support it. For the elders and myself it is a memory of the ancestors and their knowledge.” Salvador, who previously had bad experiences with filmmakers, notes, “It is a film that shows the Amazon, the lungs of the world, the greater purifying filter, and the most valuable of indigenous cultures. That is its greatest achievement.” Embrace of the Serpent is a great achievement indeed, an honest, humanistic, maddening journey that takes you places you’ve never been. Embrace of the Serpent opens February 17 at Lincoln Plaza and Film Forum; Guerra will participate in a Skype Q&A at Film Forum following the 6:40 screening on February 20.

RAMS

RAMS

A community of sheep farms is threatened by a devastating disease in RAMS

RAMS (Grímur Hákonarson, 2015)
Film Forum, 209 West Houston St., 212-727-8110
Lincoln Plaza Cinema, 1886 Broadway at 63rd St., 212-757-2280
Opens Wednesday, February 3
cohenmedia.net

When scrapie, a fatal neurodegenerative disease, is discovered in sheep in a close-knit farming community in rural Iceland, two brothers who have not spoken in forty years are forced to take a hard look at their lives in Grímur Hákonarson’s endearing gem of a film, Rams. Siblings Gummi (Sigurður Sigurjónsson) and Kiddi (Theodór Júlíusson) raise sheep on their family farm, but they are locked in a feud that has lasted four decades. Neither man has ever married or had kids, and they essentially ignore each other when not exchanging handwritten messages relayed by Kiddi’s dog. The outbreak of scrapie, which is related to mad cow disease, means that all of the rams and sheep in the area have to be slaughtered and all the facilities thoroughly cleaned and disinfected, threatening the livelihood of numerous farmers. While Kiddi reacts by hitting the bottle, Gummi, ruled by his heart, has a different plan, one that could land him in serious trouble.

RAMS

Brothers Gummi (Sigurður Sigurjónsson) and Kiddi (Theodór Júlíusson) take a hard look at life and legacy in award-winning Icelandic charmer

Rams is a sweetly told tale with a healthy dose of black comedy and spectacular facial hair. Hákonarson, a documentarian whose previous feature film was 2010’s Summerland, was inspired by his friends’ and family’s actual stories — he himself spent a lot of time on a farm as a child — giving the film an unimpeachable authenticity enhanced by the casting of local, nonprofessional actors and, of course, real sheep, which he selected very carefully. Icelandic film and theater veterans Sigurjónsson (Borgriki, Spaugstofan), who has voiced SpongeBob in the Icelandic version of SpongeBob SquarePants, and Júlíusson are fabulous together as brothers with a common goal — preserving the family legacy — while locked in a brutal personal battle. A scene involving the siblings and a backhoe loader is absolutely brilliant, laugh-out-loud funny but tinged with just the right smidgen of compassion, emblematic of the film as a whole, which uses dark humor to counteract the devastating effects of scrapie and a lament for a disappearing way of life. Rams is beautiful to look at and listen to as well, with stunning shots of the vast Bárðardalur landscape by cinematographer Sturla Brandth Grøvlen and a spare score by Atli Örvarsson amid long dialogue-free scenes featuring natural sound and classical music in the background. Winner of the Un Certain Regard prize at the 2015 Cannes Film Festival and Iceland’s submission for the Academy Awards, Rams is a lovely little film, a deeply humanistic charmer that will infect your soul — and perhaps have you reexamining any long-running family feuds of your own while stroking your favorite wool sweater.

THE COEN BROTHERS: A SERIOUS MAN

Larry Gopnik (Michael Stuhlbarg) is one serious man in underrated Coen brothers film

A SERIOUS MAN (Joel & Ethan Coen, 2009)
Film Forum
209 West Houston St.
Monday, February 1, 3:00 & 7:30
Series runs January 28 – February 4
212-727-8110
filmforum.org
focusfeatures.com

The Coen brothers take their unique brand of dry, black comedy to a whole new level with A Serious Man. Poor Larry Gopnik (a remarkably even-keeled Michael Stuhlbarg) just keeps getting dumped on: His wife, Judith (Sari Lennick), wants to leave him for, of all people, touchy-feely Sy Ableman (Fred Melamed); his brother, Arthur (Richard Kind), keeps hogging the bathroom so he can drain his cyst; his son, Danny (Aaron Wolf), won’t stop complaining that F-Troop isn’t coming in clearly and is constantly on the run from the school drug dealer (Jon Kaminsky Jr.); his daughter, Sarah (Jessica McManus), wants to get a nose job; one of his students (David Kang) has bribed him for a passing grade; his possible tenure appears to be in jeopardy; and he gets no help at all from a series of funnier and funnier rabbis. But Larry keeps on keepin’ on in the Jewish suburbs of Minnesota in 1967, trying to make a go of it as his woes pile higher and higher. Joel and Ethan Coen have crafted one of their best tales yet, nailing the look and feel of the era, from Hebrew school to Bar Mitzvah practice, from office jobs to parking lots, from the Columbia Record Club to transistor radios, from television antennas to the naked neighbor next door. The Coens get so many things right, you won’t mind the handful of mistakes in the film, and because it’s the Coens, who’s to say at least some of those errors weren’t intentional? A Serious Man is a seriously great film, made by a pair of seriously great filmmakers. And while you don’t have to be Jewish and from Minnesota to fall in love with it, it sure can’t hurt.

The Coen brothers will be at Film Forum to kick off retrospective

The Coen brothers will be at Film Forum to kick off retrospective

A Serious Man is screening at Film Forum on February 1 as part of a week-long tribute to Joel and Ethan, consisting of most of their older movies and a pair of film-related concert documentaries, leading up to a sneak preview of their latest, Hail, Caesar! For more than thirty years, the Coens have been capturing the American zeitgeist like no one else, penetrating deep into the psyche of the country, doing so in a wide variety of genres. The series skips over Intolerable Cruelty, The Ladykillers, and Burn After Reading, but the rest of their oeuvre is present and accounted for, from the creepy, atmospheric Blood Simple and Barton Fink to the mad humor of The Hudsucker Proxy and Raising Arizona, from the brutal Westerns No Country for Old Men and True Grit to the gangster picture Miller’s Crossing, in addition to their cult masterpiece, The Big Lebowski. Things get going on January 28 with the beautifully elegant Fargo, followed by a Q&A with Joel and Ethan. D. A. Pennebaker, Chris Hegedus, and Nick Doob will be at Film Forum on February 3 for a showing of their concert film Down from the Mountain, featuring the music from O Brother, Where Art Thou?

STRATFORD ON HOUSTON: OTHELLO

OTHELLO (courtesy Carlotta Films)

Orson Welles’s OTHELLO kicks off Film Forum series commemorating the four hundredth anniversary of the death of the Bard (courtesy Carlotta Films)

OTHELLO (Orson Welles, 1952)
Film Forum
209 West Houston St.
Wednesday, January 13, 12:30, 4:40, 9:15
Series runs January 13-21
212-727-8110
filmforum.org
www.carlottafilms-us.com

Film Forum follows up its two-week presentation of the restored version of Orson Welles’s spectacular Shakespearean adaptation, Chimes at Midnight, by kicking off its commemoration of the four hundredth anniversary of the death of the Bard, “Stratford on Houston,” with Welles’s Othello and the director’s cut of his Macbeth on January 13. Filmed in black-and-white over three years in multiple locations and ultimately employing five cinematographers, four editors, three Desdemonas, and two scores, it’s rather amazing that Welles’s 1952 independent production of William Shakespeare’s Othello was ever completed — of course, many Welles projects were not. That the final work turned out to be a masterpiece that won the Palme d’Or at Cannes speaks yet more to Welles’s genius. Welles, who directed the picture and plays the title character, streamlined the story into ninety-five minutes, getting to the heart of the most intense tale of jealousy and betrayal ever told. The film opens with shadowy shots of the dead Othello and his deceased wife, Desdemona (Suzanne Cloutier), carried aloft on biers at their dual funeral, to the sounds of an ominous piano and a mournful vocal chorus. The credits soon follow, after which Welles returns to the beginning, as the villainous ensign Iago (Micheál MacLiammóir) plots with Roderigo (Robert Coote) to convince Othello that his loyal and devoted wife is actually in love with the heroic soldier Michael Cassio (Michael Laurence).

At first Othello brushes away Iago’s concerns, but soon he is caught in Iago’s trap and starts to question the fairy-tale love he shares with his beautiful and trusting bride. As the story proceeds, characters are shown in extreme close-up, in narrow passages and doorways, amid medieval rooms with large columns and intricately designed windows, shadows looming everywhere; the stunning architecture, shot at disorienting angles, is a character unto itself. Welles did whatever it took to finish the film, including using his own funds from acting jobs and filming a scene in a bathhouse when costumes were unavailable, lending the proceedings a fragmented feel that evokes the mirrors in the finale of The Lady from Shanghai. Unfortunately, the syncing of the dialogue track is still often off and numerous cuts are too shaky, but they detract only a bit from the overall power and majesty of the film, a bold and brave take on a familiar Shakespeare tale given a dark new life by a master auteur. “Stratford on Houston” continues through January 21 with such other Shakespeare and Bard-related films as Laurence Olivier’s Hamlet, Richard III, and Henry V, Fred McLeod Wilcox’s sci-fi classic, Forbidden Planet, Franco Zeffirelli’s Romeo and Juliet, and Roman Polanski’s Macbeth.

CHIMES AT MIDNIGHT

Restoration of Orson Welless CHIMES AT MIDNIGHT is playing special engagement at Film Forum

Restoration of Orson Welles’s CHIMES AT MIDNIGHT is playing special engagement at Film Forum

CHIMES AT MIDNIGHT (FALSTAFF) (Orson Welles, 1965)
Film Forum
209 West Houston St.
January 1-19
212-727-8110
filmforum.org

“Jesus, the days that we have seen,” Justice Shallow (Alan Webb) says to Sir John Falstaff (Orson Welles) several times at the beginning of Chimes at Midnight, as the two old friends walk through a snowy forest. “We have heard the chimes at midnight,” Falstaff replies. Welles’s career as a writer, director, and actor in theater, television, radio, and film was fraught with conflict as budget problems, scheduling issues, and fights with producers led to a slew of unfinished projects and works edited against his wishes. Welles might have achieved his legendary status with such classic films as Citizen Kane, The Magnificent Ambersons, and Touch of Evil, but his own personal favorite was the 1965 black-and-white Chimes at Midnight (aka Falstaff). Welles spent decades working on his unique retelling of the story of the big, bawdy Sir John, attempting various stage productions before finally making the film in Spain in 1964-65. The script was adapted from Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Parts 1 and 2, Richard II, Henry V, and The Merry Wives of Windsor, with historical narration by Sir Ralph Richardson from the sixteenth-century Holinshed’s Chronicles. Welles is both boisterous and sad as Falstaff, a larger-than-life braggadocio who is both friend and father figure to Hal (Keith Baxter), the Prince of Wales, whose father, Henry IV (Sir John Gielgud), gained the throne by murdering Richard II. Hal would rather cavort with Ned Poins (Tony Beckley), Falstaff, and Falstaff’s rogue circle, which includes Pistol (Michael Aldridge), Bardolph (Patrick Bedford), and Peto, than serve the king at the castle. Meanwhile, Richard II’s supporters, led by the Earl of Worcester (Fernando Rey), Henry Percy, known as Hotspur (Norman Rodway), and the Earl of Northumberland (José Nieto), plot to take back the crown. Much of the film is set in the Boar’s Head Tavern, which is run by the elderly Mistress Quickly (Margaret Rutherford) and where Falstaff engages with prostitute Doll Tearsheet (Jeanne Moreau). Everything comes crashing together during the Battle of Shrewsbury, one of the most exciting, breathtaking battle scenes ever filmed, a nearly ten-minute spectacle of fierce fighting interlaced with Falstaff’s comic bumbling and concluding with Hal and Hotspur’s climactic face-off.

Lines are drawn for classic battle after the Earl of Northumberland (Fernando Rey) meets with Prince Hal (Keith Baxte) and King Henry IV (Sir John Gielgud) in CHIMES AT MIDNIGHT

Lines are drawn for classic battle after the Earl of Northumberland (Fernando Rey) meets with Prince Hal (Keith Baxter) and King Henry IV (Sir John Gielgud) in CHIMES AT MIDNIGHT

Chimes at Midnight, which Welles called his “greatest film ever,” is one of the grandest Shakespeare adaptations ever committed to celluloid, a staggering achievement despite all of the usual roadblocks in Welles’s way, including limited time with the actors (resulting in many pick-up shots of stand-ins for Gielgud and others, seen from the back — Welles has boasted about one scene in particular in which seven actors are all played by stand-ins), continual funding dilemmas (to the point where Welles convinced one producer that he was actually making Treasure Island), location issues, and poor audio dubbing (with Welles sometimes providing the dialogue for other characters; even the great Fernando Rey’s voice is dubbed in by someone else because of the Spanish actor’s strong accent). Welles plays Falstaff with a gluttonous lust for life that is intoxicating and infectious, even as his certain fate nears, echoing Welles’s personal life and professional career. “What is difficult about Falstaff, I believe, is that he is the greatest conception of a good man, the most completely good man, in all drama,” Welles explained about the role, which he called “the most difficult part I ever played,” one he performed onstage, on film, and even on The Dean Martin Show. “He was a spokesman, you might say, for Merrie England, the old Merrie England of May mornings and midsummer eves, when even villainy was innocent,” Welles added. “The film was not intended as a lament for Falstaff, but for the death of Merrie England. . . . It is more than Falstaff who is dying. It’s the old England, dying and betrayed.” Cinematographer Edmond Richard (The Trial, The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie) gets right up close to Welles, exploiting his massive face and girth, while shooting other scenes from a distance, using a depth of focus that highlights the loneliness of the king in empty, shadowy rooms as he ponders his future; Richard makes the scenes in the tavern feel almost claustrophobic, concentrating on low angles and swirling movement. Baxter, who is eerily reminiscent of Anthony Perkins (Perkins, who had previously starred in Welles’s adaptation of Kafka’s The Trial, actually wanted the role, but Welles had already promised it to Baxter, who performed it onstage as well), plays Hal with a childlike delight until things start getting serious during and after the intense, mind-blowing Battle of Shrewsbury, which directly influenced such films as Braveheart and Saving Private Ryan and is still as powerful as ever. In many ways, Chimes at Midnight is the culmination of Welles’s career as a writer, director, actor, and producer, his last fiction film to be released theatrically. “If I wanted to get into heaven on the basis of one movie, that’s the one I would offer up,” he said. “I think it’s because it is to me the least flawed; let me put it that way. It is the most successful for what I tried to do. I succeeded more completely in my view with that than with anything else.”

The film has been little seen over the decades, in part because of rights issues as well as the quality of the available prints. But in honor of its fiftieth anniversary and the centennial of Welles’s birth, a beautiful digital restoration of Chimes at Midnight, more than twenty years in the making (courtesy of Janus Films and the Criterion Collection), is now touring the country, screening January 1-12 at Film Forum. “There is no film we have waited longer for or worked harder to free up, and none we are prouder to present,” Criterion president Peter Becker recently told Wellesnet. Chimes at Midnight, in which Welles’s daughter, Beatrice, also appears, now looks better than ever, as if it’s a brand-new film, earning reconsideration as the masterpiece it truly is. And there’s more to come, as work continues on a full 4K restoration and preservation that, Becker noted, will take years to complete. The film, which won the Grand Technical Prize at Cannes and a Twentieth Anniversary Prize for Welles, takes on new meaning all these years later, knowing what became of Welles and his legacy. It’s very much a film about family, friendship, loyalty, and aging; even though Welles was only forty-nine at the time he made the film, he was already considered old and past his prime. This new restoration of Chimes at Midnight, however, shows the film to be an ageless classic, Welles firmly at the height of his estimable powers. (Baxter will be at Film Forum on January 6 to introduce the 7:30 screening and participate in a Q&A after.)

PIERROT LE FOU

Film Forum will host brand-new restoration of Godard classic

Jean-Paul Belmondo and Anna Karina are excited about brand-new restoration of Jean-Luc Godard classic

PIERROT LE FOU (Jean-Luc Godard, 1965)
Film Forum
209 West Houston St.
December 18-24
212-727-8110
www.filmforum.org

Art, American consumerism, the Vietnam and Algerian wars, Hollywood, and cinema itself get skewered in Jean-Luc Godard’s fab faux gangster flick / road comedy / romance epic / musical Pierrot Le Fou. Based on Lionel White’s novel Obsession, the film follows the chaotic exploits of Ferdinand Griffon (Jean-Paul Belmondo) and Marianne Renoir (Anna Karina, Godard’s then-wife), former lovers who meet up again quite by accident. The bored Ferdinand immediately decides to leave his wife and family for the flirtatious, unpredictable Marianne, who insists on calling him Pierrot despite his protestations. Soon Ferdinand is caught in the middle of a freewheeling journey involving gun running, stolen cars, dead bodies, and half-truths, all the while not quite sure how much he can trust Marianne.

Filmed in reverse-scene order without much of a script, the mostly improvised Pierrot Le Fou was shot in stunning color by Raoul Coutard. Many of Godard’s recurring themes and styles appear in the movie, including jump cuts, confusing dialogue, written protests on walls, and characters speaking directly at the audience, who are more or less along for the same ride as Ferdinand. And as with many Godard films, the ending is a doozy. Two years ago, when the film was shown at Anthology Film Archives as part of a series selected by John Zorn, the avant-garde musician explained, “Pierrot holds a special place in my heart — I am really a Romantic, not a Postmodern — and this film’s music never ceases to reduce me to tears.” You can see and hear for yourself December 18-24 when Film Forum unveils the brand-new fiftieth-anniversary restoration of this Nouvelle Vague favorite.

HITCHCOCK/TRUFFAUT

Documentary examines the extraordinary interview sessions between François Truffaut and Alfred Hitchcock (photo by Philippe Halsman)

Documentary examines the extraordinary interview sessions between François Truffaut and Alfred Hitchcock (photo by Philippe Halsman)

HITCHCOCK/TRUFFAUT (Kent Jones, 2015)
Film Forum
209 West Houston St.
December 2-17
212-727-8110
filmforum.org
cohenmedia.net/films

“In 1962, while in New York to present Jules and Jim, I noticed that every journalist asked me the same question: ‘Why do the critics of Cahiers du Cinéma take Hitchcock so seriously? He’s rich and successful, but his movies have no substance,’” French Nouvelle Vague auteur François Truffaut wrote in the preface to the second edition of what he called “the hitchbook,” the seminal film bible Truffaut/Hitchcock. “In the course of an interview during which I praised Rear Window to the skies, an American critic surprised me by commenting, ‘You love Rear Window because, as a stranger to New York, you know nothing about Greenwich Village.’ To this absurd statement, I replied, ‘Rear Window is not about Greenwich Village, it is a film about cinema, and I do know cinema.’” Truffaut was determined to change the prevailing belief that British director Alfred Hitchcock was a maker of studio fluff. “In examining his films,” Truffaut continued, “it was obvious that he had given more thought to the potential of his art than any of his colleagues. It occurred to me that if he would, for the first time, agree to respond seriously to a systematic questionnaire, the resulting document might modify the American critics’ approach to Hitchcock. That is what this book is all about.” The tome compiled a weeklong series of conversations between the thirty-year-old Truffaut and the sixty-three-year-old Hitchcock — the talks began on Hitch’s birthday — in the latter’s Hollywood studio office, with Helen Scott serving as translator. Although the interviews were recorded for audio, no film was shot; instead, Philippe Halsman took still photos. The story of the unique relationship between Truffaut, who as of 1962 had made only The 400 Blows and Shoot the Piano Player (he was in the midst of finalizing Jules and Jim), and Hitchcock, who was preparing his forty-eighth film, The Birds, is told in the splendid documentary Hitchcock/Truffaut, which cleverly reverses the order of their names from the book it’s based on. Writer-director Kent Jones (head of the New York Film Festival), cowriter Serge Toubiana (former editor in chief of Cahiers du Cinéma) and editor Rachel Reichman lovingly combine Halsman’s pictures, audio clips from the original sessions, scenes from many of Hitchcock’s films (and a few of Truffaut’s), close-ups of dozens of pages from the book, rare archival footage, and new interviews with ten directors from around the world who weigh in on what makes Hitchcock’s work so special, so illuminating, so influential.

Sharing their praise are Martin Scorsese, Wes Anderson, David Fincher, Olivier Assayas, Peter Bogdanovich, Arnaud Desplechin, James Gray, Kiyoshi Kurosawa, Richard Linklater, and Paul Schrader, as they shed light on such classic films as Vertigo, Psycho, I Confess, The Wrong Man, Sabotage, Marnie, Rear Window, and others, with detailed shot-by-shot analysis while also praising the importance of “the hitchbook” itself. It all makes for an eye-opening crash course in cinema, and it’s likely to change the way you look and think about motion pictures. “It was a window into the world of cinema that I hadn’t had before, because it was a director simultaneously talking about his own work but doing so in a way that was utterly unpretentious and had no pomposity,” Gray (Little Odessa, Two Lovers) says about the book. “There was starting to be these kind of erudite conversations about the art form, but Truffaut was the first one where you really felt that they were talking about the craft of it,” Schrader (American Gigolo, Mishima) points out. “It’s not just that Truffaut wrote a book about Hitchcock. The book is an essential part of his body of work,” Olivier Assayas (Clouds of Sils Maria, Carlos) explains. “I think it conclusively changed people’s opinions about Hitchcock, and so Hitchcock began to be taken much more seriously,” Bogdanovich (The Last Picture Show, Paper Moon) asserts. And Scorsese (Taxi Driver, Raging Bull) sums up, “It was almost as if somebody had taken a weight off our shoulders and said yes, we can embrace this, we could go.” Of course, the book not only created a critical reassessment of Hitchcock but also helped Truffaut’s budding career. Narrated by Bob Balaban, the film places the work of the two men, who remained good friends until Hitchcock’s death in 1980 at the age of eighty (sadly, Truffaut died four years later at the age of fifty-two), in context of the history of cinema. “Why do these Hitchcock films stand up well? Well, I don’t know the answer,” Hitchcock is heard saying at the beginning of the documentary. By the end of the documentary, you will surely know the answer. Following its recent screening at DOC NYC with Jones and Scorsese present, Hitchcock/Truffaut will be playing at Film Forum December 2-17.