this week in theater

SOMETHING NEW: CARL HOLDER’S OUT OF ORDER IN EAST VILLAGE BASEMENT

Carl Holder shares his hopes and dreams, his successes and failures in Out of Order (photo by Rebecca J Michelson)

OUT OF ORDER
East Village Basement
321 East Ninth St. between First & Second Aves.
Thursday – Tuesday through July 30, $30-$60
www.outofordertheshow.com
www.carlholder.com

“When was the last time you felt something new?” Carl Holder asks in the New York City premiere of his solo participatory Out of Order, which opened tonight for a three-week run at the appropriately named East Village Basement on Ninth St.

I now have the answer: Holder’s frantic and frenetic show.

Despite penning plays for twenty years and winning several awards and grants, upon turning forty the Gainesville-born, Brooklyn-based Holder found himself with a bad case of writer’s block. Worried he had reached the end of the road, he came up with Out of Order, a one-man production that challenges him to perform prompts from three dozen index cards, tossed into a bowl in random order, many involving audience participation. The only element that is the same for each presentation is the first card, which falls from a box on the ceiling and is read by an audience member, laying out the ground rules, including the following: “Everything you are about to see is real. If Carl doesn’t complete every task tonight, he will quit theater forever.” He’s not kidding.

The evening actually begins with the audience gathering downstairs, filling small bags of free popcorn from a cart in the center of the room and purchasing beer, wine, or seltzer from the bar in the far corner, operated by Simon Henriques, who will soon serve as “referee,” running the sound and lighting, strumming a ukulele, and keeping track of the time.

Audience members are encouraged to take and post their own photos at one point of unique solo show at East Village Basement (photo by Rebecca J Michelson)

Wearing a blue track suit and off-white sneakers, Holder races around the room, selecting a card from a big glass bowl in the middle, reading it out loud, and then acting it out, sometimes using a whiteboard, a lone chair, and/or an audience member. On the floor are such words and phrases as “You,” “Me,” “RIP,” and “Climax.” For “Three questions,” he says “How long do I have to wait?” three very different ways, each with its own meaning. For “Show your bank statement,” he does exactly that, projecting his bank statement on a wall and going over it in detail, talking about how much he has in his account, what he has spent money on, and how he might not be able to make his next rent payment by the due date. For “Teach them how to write a play,” he outlines on the board the five key ingredients of a play: Exposition, Inciting Incident, Rising Action, Climax, and Falling Action or Denouement. There are also separate cards for each element, allowing him to give a mini-theater class. Among the other prompts are “How much do you like being in control?,” “Can this be enough?,” and “Be brave.” While not every prompt works, the vast majority do.

There are several cards that relate the complex story of Ass, Chicken, and Peacock on Farmer Farmer’s Farm, involving ego, corporatization, self-awareness, drinking, and dancing; as with “Teach them how to write a play,” the order in which they’re told impacts the narrative, particularly when it comes to how a carrot is used, not just as food, but as creative incentive. For “Try again,” Holder explains, “This whole thing really started because I couldn’t write a play. And I guess I still can’t. But I found I could write down the things I couldn’t stop thinking to myself, the thoughts that were getting in the way of a play. Card by card. And somehow, more than anything I’ve tried to make for the last twenty years, doing this actually feels like being an animal.”

The night I went, the first prompt was about the bank statement, so that led to a focus that might change if, for example, “Mortality” or “Open this later” was selected instead. Thus, we knew from the start what serious financial shape Holder is currently in and how important this play is to his daily existence. It also makes us think about our own fiscal solvency, although so many of the prompts make us look at our unique personal situations.

I was chosen for one of the final cards, “Review the possibilities,” in which I read sixteen statements about how Holder’s life might go, and he decided which might happen and which should be tossed in the trash as a pipe dream. As I announced what was written on each card, I thought about how it related to my own life, and I imagine that must have been the case with just about everyone in the audience. Who hasn’t considered such possibilities as “I will have the money I need to live comfortably” or “I will mend ties with my family”?

Audience interaction is central to Carl Holder’s Out of Order (photo by twi-ny/mdr)

And therein lies why Out of Order, previously staged in living rooms, a theater lobby, a public park, and a bird sanctuary and designed by Adam Wyron and Obie-winning director Skylar Fox, is such a success, whether Holder realizes or not. At each performance, forty or so strangers are brought together in a small room, partake of food and drink, and interact with Holder and other audience members for ninety nearly breathless minutes as Holder shares his hopes and dreams with us, almost painfully realistically, and we do the same with him (if we so desire).

He is eminently likable; we immediately want him to do well. And he is very funny and quick on his feet, with sharp improvisatory skills. I was sitting at the far end of my row and had put my popcorn, wineglass, and phone on the shelf next to me. When Holder ran over there to act out a card, he first took my bag of popcorn and started casually eating from it. It’s important to note that he does not force anyone to do anything, but as one of the prompts announces, “Content warning: audience participation.”

For “The forgotten intro,” Holder even sings, summing up life in a few stanzas: “We are all born once and then we die / along the way we try some things / some are good some are bad some are great / most are forgettable . . . / but every so often a moment comes along / that’s a little bit different than all of the other moments / . . . you get to have this one special moment / and the other special moments where you’re not dead yet / and sometimes people gather around and they want to wish you well / and tell you something special, something very special / and this is one of those moments and that something very special is . . .”

I’m not about to give away what that something very special is here, since, in the show, just like in life, that’s for you to discover. But we should all be thankful that Holder has shared his special moments with us.

[Mark Rifkin is a Brooklyn-born, Manhattan-based writer and editor; you can follow him on Substack here.]

THE GREAT DEBATE: FEMINISM ON TRIAL AT MCC

Emmanuelle Mattana wrote and stars in Trophy Boys at MCC (photo by Valerie Terranova)

TROPHY BOYS
Susan & Ronald Frankel Theater
Robert W. Wilson MCC Theater Space
511 West Fifty-Second St. between Tenth & Eleventh Aves.
Through August 3, $64-$114
mcctheater.org

The Breakfast Club meets John Proctor Is the Villain in the US premiere of Emmanuelle Mattana’s Trophy Boys at MCC.

The seventy-minute play takes place in approximate real time as four men from the private boys school Imperium are prepping for a debate against their sister private school, St. Gratia. Owen (Mattana) is a wonk who sees a clear path for himself to become president of the United States. Jared (Louisa Jacobson) is an artist who loves women, and repeatedly reminds everyone of that. Scott (Esco Jouléy) is an athlete who randomly shows off his physical prowess. And David (Terry Hu), the quietest of the team, is determined to become a powerful businessman.

All four roles are portrayed by actors who identify as either female, gender nonconforming, or nonbinary, adding a complicated layer to the argument the high school seniors are given for the debate: “Feminism has failed women — affirmative.”

The humanities classroom is filled with posters depicting famous women, some with one-word descriptions, among them Oprah Winfrey, Amelia Earhart, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Frida Kahlo, Yoko Ono, Gloria Steinem, Michelle Obama (Empathy), Mother Teresa (Compassion), Katherine Johnson (Hard Work), and Harriet Tubman (Fearlessness). “I am at my most inspired when surrounded by inspiring women,” David says, then calls out excitedly, “Malala!!!” upon seeing a framed picture of Pakistani activist Malala Yousafzai.

The cocky boys, who have had an undefeated season thus far, have one hour to assemble their argument, with Owen putting himself in charge, telling the others, “Trust me. When have I let you down? International politics round you relied on me to know all about the complexities of Pyongyang’s internal power struggle. Technology round I knew all about the ethics of AI in sex dolls. Sports round I knew all the football players with charges of assault. And I don’t even like sports. It’s the same here. I’m on an academic scholarship. I’m smart. Trust me.”

As they proceed, Scott worries about their being accused of mansplaining. Jared doesn’t want to get canceled for accidentally saying something that might be offensive and upset his girlfriend. David complains that he is screwed up because his mother spent more time on the board of eight multinational corporations rather than breast-feeding him. And Owen is not about to let anything get in the way of his political career.

They discuss intersectionalism, pole dancing, the male gaze, the correct word for a woman’s nether region, periods, boobs, women CEOs, the divine feminism, and tradwives, taking potshots at each other’s manhood as if they were in a locker room, complete with a dose of homophobia. Taking notes on the whiteboard, Owen doesn’t realize when he has drawn both a penis and a vagina/vulva.

But when the boys discover that one of them has been accused of sexual assault by a St. Gratia debater, their attitudes about power, gender, and feminism itself begin to morph as they turn on one another, unwilling to jeopardize their futures even as they insist that all women should be believed.

Jared (Louisa Jacobson), Owen (Emmanuelle Mattana), Scott (Esco Jouléy), and David (Terry Hu) have their work cut out for them as final debate nears (photo by Valerie Terranova)

Mattana, who wrote the play when she was twenty-one, quit competitive high school debating “to become an artist and hang out with other queer weirdos who helped me imagine a braver, more radical future.” In the program, she points out, “The very nature of the endeavour — turning argument into sport while believing yourself the smartest in any room — required you fervently argue things you didn’t know enough about or even necessarily believe. Logic was a game, something to be won or lost, and words and arguments were things you could twist at your own whim. If you were articulate and commanding enough you could speak over anyone, or for anyone. It was no wonder this ethos seeped so dangerously into other parts of these boys’ lives. . . . Gender is learnt, which means it is also taught. No more so than to those young men I knew from debate. With this brand of masculinity inhabited onstage by non-cis male bodies, my hope is that it can be revealed for what it truly is — a comical, absurd, and ultimately disturbing performance.”

Trophy Boys is all those things and more. The play is skillfully directed by Danya Taymor, who won a Tony for The Outsiders and was nominated for John Proctor Is the Villain, both of which also deal with toxic masculinity and gender; she and movement director Tilly Evans-Krueger employ full use of Matt Saunders’s realistic set, adroitly lit by Cha See. But Mattana, in their playwriting debut — they have previously appeared in such television series as Mustangs FC and Videoland and cowrote and starred in the feature film Fwends — isn’t about to make anything easy for the audience, providing no simple answers while avoiding genre clichés. In one of the most potent scenes, the four actors strip out of Márion Talán de la Rosa’s school uniform costumes down to their skivvies, a revealing moment that posits that body type does not define gender.

There is plenty of mansplaining, which gets complicated since it’s being delivered by non-cis-male performers, building in an inherent humor and ridiculousness. “Our case has to be more feminist than the pro-feminist side. We believe feminism has failed women from the perspective that we are actually more feminist than the feminists,” Owen declares. David offers, “It’s because they hate us. They hate men. That’s why feminism has really failed. It’s not interested in helping women, it’s interested in denigrating men.” Scott says, “Everyone’s confused about whether Emily Ratajkowski showing her ass on Instagram is feminist or not,” to which Jared, who, as a reminder, really loves women, replies, “Fuck, she’s hot.”

Hu (Never Have I Ever), Jacobson (Lunch Bunch), Jouléy (Merry Me, Wolf Play), and Mattana form a tight-knit, believable quartet of students in a classroom, a setting used for such other recent hard-hitting plays as Donja R. Love’s soft, Sanaz Toossi’s Pulitzer Prize—winning English, and Dave Harris’s Exception to the Rule. They are like a sports team getting ready for the big game, each with their own responsibility, to themselves as well as their team.

Occasionally, the characters, particularly Owen, recognize that the audience is present, making direct gestures at us, but I found those instances perplexing, not sure whether we were supposed to be the crowd watching the eventual debate or the MCC audience, and they seemed to be unnecessary breaks in the fourth wall.

Otherwise, Trophy Boys is a rousing and inventive twenty-first-century battle of the sexes — which is, I imagine, an out-of-date phrase, but please don’t cancel me — that will have you gasping, laughing, and whooping it up, but possibly not always in unison with the rest of the audience.

[Mark Rifkin is a Brooklyn-born, Manhattan-based writer and editor; you can follow him on Substack here.]

ENCORE ENGAGEMENT: THE MAN WHO SHOT LIBERTY VALANCE

Onomatopoeia’s The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance is back for an encore engagement at the Gene Frankel Theatre (photo by Joshua Eichenbaum)

THE MAN WHO SHOT LIBERTY VALANCE
Gene Frankel Theatre
24 Bond St. at Lafayette St.
Wednesday – Sunday through July 27, $25-$35
www.genefrankeltheatre.com
www.theonomatopoeiatheatrecompany.com

In 2022, the Onomatopoeia Theatre Company presented the New York premiere of Jethro Compton’s The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance. It is now back for a return engagement, through July 27 at the Gene Frankel Theatre. Below is my original review; cast changes include Mari Blake as Hallie Jackson, Dillon Collins as Jake Dowitt, and Ben-David Carlson and Emily Cummings in multiple roles. In addition, no blank guns will be used, only nonfiring replica prop guns and sound effects.

“The hairs on your arm will stand up / At the terror in each sip and in each sup / Will you partake of that last offered cup / Or disappear into the potter’s ground? / When the man comes around,” Johnny Cash warned on the title track of his 2002 American IV album. The song is one of many by the Man in Black that echo in the Gene Frankel Theatre before the start and during intermission of Onomatopoeia Theatre Company’s stirring New York premiere of Jethro Compton’s The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance. In this case, the man coming around is Liberty Valance.

British playwright Compton’s 2014 play is based on the 1953 short story by Dorothy M. Johnson; the twenty-two-page tale was turned into a popular 1962 John Ford film packed with an all-star cast — John Wayne, James Stewart, Vera Miles, Lee Marvin, Edmond O’Brien, Andy Devine, John Carradine, Jeanette Nolan, Woody Strode, Denver Pyle, Strother Martin, Lee Van Cleef — but Compton’s adaptation brings the play into the twenty-first century, twisting many of the movie’s genre clichés inside out as he takes on social and racial injustice while toning down the movie’s political rhetoric, general Hollywood misogyny, and freedom of the press blather.

The two-and-a-half-hour show begins in 1910, as Sen. Ransome Foster (Leighton Samuels) and his wife, Hallie (Stephanie Craven), arrive in Twotrees for the funeral of Bert Barricune (Samuel Shurtleff), who seems to have been an insignificant forgotten man in an insignificant one-horse town. Young reporter Jake Dowitt (Jeff Brackett) wants an exclusive with the senator, leading to a flashback to 1890, when a severely injured Foster is brought into the Prairie Belle Saloon by Barricune. After he is tended to by Jackson and Jim “the Reverend” Mosten (Daniel Kornegay), who works for her, he explains that he was beaten by three men who turn out to be the villainous murderer Liberty Valance (Derek Jack Chariton) and his henchmen.

Foster is a peaceful man from New York, a law scholar traveling not with a gun but with legal texts, Shakespeare sonnets, Greek tragedies, and a Bible. When Marshal Johnson (Scott Zimmerman) refuses to arrest Valance, Foster considers going up against the feared gunslinger himself. “I am no law man, sir,” Foster admits. The marshal responds, “Seems from what I’ve heard you ain’t much good at defending yourself, let alone a town.”

Soon Foster is teaching some residents of Twotrees to read, which angers others, especially since Jackson is a woman and Mosten is the only Black man around; book learning is not for the likes of them. Much of the strength of the play comes from the power Compton invests in the two characters; in the short story and movie, Jackson is a restaurant employee, while Mosten is Barricune’s loyal helper and doesn’t even appear in Johnson’s tale. In the play, Jackson speaks her mind with a razor sharpness, while Mosten is a well-respected man who has the ability to memorize whatever anyone says or reads to him.

Barricune is not happy when he sees Foster and Jackson spending a lot of time together; Bert believes he is destined to marry her. “She’s always been my girl,” Barricune says. “Does she know that?” Foster replies.

After Valance and his two sycophants commit a horrific act, Foster is more intent than ever to face him down and let the chips fall where they may.

Ransome Foster (Leighton Samuels) and Liberty Valance (Derek Jack Chariton) are headed to a final showdown in Onomatopoeia production (photo by Joshua Eichenbaum)

The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance takes place primarily on Nino Amari’s intimate set, a small Western saloon with a bar in the far corner, one table, two windows on either side of a piano, and swinging wooden doors in the back (which audience members must walk through to use the restrooms, but not during the performance). Most of the action occurs at the angled bar, including two sizzling scenes with Valance, the first between him and Mosten, the second him and Foster. Neither scene is in the short story or film, so the suspense is ratcheted up.

In his New York stage debut, Charlton is a magnetic force, his every word and move electrifying. He knows exactly who Valance is and what he wants, a villain who has no veneration for the law or for Blacks. When Foster raises the possibility of his defeating him in a showdown, the cocky Valance says, “Unless the hand of God comes down and strikes me dead there ain’t much chance of that.” Foster, knowing he doesn’t really have a shot, responds, “Or the earth opens up and the Devil takes you under.” Valance retorts, “No. We have an agreement, me and him.” When those words are spoken by Charlton, you don’t doubt it.

The rest of the cast holds up its end of the bargain; Samuels and Craven have a sweet chemistry, Shurtleff portrays Barricune with an inner loneliness, and Zimmerman’s marshal is neither coward nor buffoon. (Assistant director Chandler Robyn ably portrays numerous small roles.)

The play is expertly helmed by Onomatopoeia artistic director Thomas R. Gordon, maintaining a thrilling tension throughout. Susan Yanofsky’s period costumes are effective, while Reid Sullivan’s lighting hints at a danger always lurking, although the changing colors in the two windows are sometimes confusing. The narration occasionally gets in the way of the plot, explaining what we already know or making a point that is better left for the audience to decide for themselves.

Compton has also adapted F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Curious Case of Benjamin Button into a Celtic musical and Jack London’s White Fang into Wolf’s Blood; his Frontier Trilogy is set in the American West in the mid-nineteenth century, while The Bunker Trilogy delves into Arthurian legend, classical Greek tragedy, and Shakespearean drama. In Liberty Valance he has created a stage Western for our times, cleverly referencing the conflicts of contemporary America, as red states battle blue states over jobs, immigration, and education; rights for women, people of color, and LGBTQIA+ are in serious jeopardy; gun control is being hotly debated; and liberal urban elites and the conservative south and Midwest seem immersed in an endless duel. The arguments the citizens of Twotrees are having are not unlike what we see every day on social media and partisan news outlets.

In the play, Foster teaches his class Shakespeare’s seventy-first sonnet, which reads in part: “No longer mourn for me when I am dead / Than you shall hear the surly sullen bell / Give warning to the world that I am fled / From this vile world with vilest worms to dwell.” Johnny Cash couldn’t have said it any better.

[Mark Rifkin is a Brooklyn-born, Manhattan-based writer and editor; you can follow him on Substack here.]

DOES THE END JUSTIFY THE MEANS? NYCT’S ALL’S WELL EN PLEIN AIR

New York Classical Theatre’s All’s Well That Ends Well travels from Central Park to Carl Schurz Park to Battery Park (photo © Da Ping Luo)

ALL’S WELL THAT ENDS WELL
June 3-22: Central Park, Central Park West & 103rd St.
June 24-29: Carl Schurz Park, East 87th St. & East End Ave.
July 1-6: Castle Clinton, Battery Park
nyclassical.org

Every summer, numerous companies deliver free Shakespeare in parks (and even a parking lot) throughout the five boroughs. One of the best, most consistent troupes is New York Classical Theatre (NYCT), which has “staged” more than nine hundred free performances since 2000, including nearly two dozen Bard plays in addition to classics by Oscar Wilde, Anton Chekhov, Molière, Bernard Shaw, Friedrich Schiller, and others. Burdman refers to it as Panoramic Theatre, in which scenes take place in different parts of the parks, the audience moving along with the cast. NYCT has done it again with a splendid revival of All’s Well That Ends Well.

Most everyone knows the phrase “All’s well that ends well,” but few have actually seen what is one of the Bard’s problem plays, and it feels as problematic as ever in the twenty-first century. However, Burdman and NYCT are breathing new life into it this season as it travels from Central Park to Carl Schurz Park to Castle Clinton in Battery Park, continuing the mission they began in 2000: “NY Classical firmly believes that everyone — regardless of economic, social, or educational background — should have the opportunity to enjoy live professional theatre together as a community. Our free, engaging performances interpreted for approachable spaces inspire experienced theatergoers to reconnect with the classics and build new and future audiences.”

All’s Well That Ends Well is a kind of rom-com with an edge, a twist that feels forced, and not just in the current environment. Helena (Anique Clements) has been recently orphaned by the death of her father, Gérard de Narbonne, physician to the ailing king of France (Nick Salamone). She is now a ward of the countess of Roussillon (Carine Montbertrand) and is deeply in love with the countess’s son, Bertram (Paul Deo Jr.), who wants nothing to do with her. Helena travels to the king to offer him one of her father’s remedies; the king is suspect, since so many other doctors have failed him, so Helena offers him a deal: The king will take the prescription and, if it cures him, Helena can choose any man in the kingdom to be her husband, but if he is still sick, he can have Helena executed. The king agrees.

The king’s fistula goes away, and Helena tells him she wishes to marry Bertram, who is strongly against the union but must ultimately fulfill the king’s command. But instead of consummating the marriage, Bertram takes off to fight in Florence, leaving behind a letter in which he sets for his new bride what appear to be impossible tasks: “When thou canst get the ring upon my finger, which never shall come off, and show me a child begotten of thy body that I am father to, then call me husband. But in such a ‘then,’ I write a ‘never.’”

Bertram is accompanied by his untrustworthy friend, Parolles (Karel Heřmánek), a fool and a coward who thinks he’s a fashionista and doesn’t realize when he’s being ridiculed, including by the French courtier Lafeu (Clay Sorseth), who wouldn’t mind if his daughter were to wed Bertram.

A determined Helena disguises herself as a pilgrim and goes to Italy, where she meets old widow Capilet (Montbertrand) and her virgin daughter, Diana (Angelique Archer). The three devise a plan to coerce Bertram into marrying Helena, and it’s a devious one that is at the heart of why the play is so rarely performed.

Anique Clements and Carine Montbertrand stand out in NYCT Shakespeare production in the parks (photo © Da Ping Luo)

Partly inspired by a story from Boccaccio’s Decameron that was adapted by Geoffrey Chaucer in “The Clerk’s Tale,” All’s Well That Ends Well has been performed at the Delacorte in the Public Theater’s Shakespeare in the Park series four times, in 1966, 1978, 1993, and 2011, and has appeared on Broadway only once: Trevor Nunn’s Royal Shakespeare production, which ran for a month at the Martin Beck in 1983. Otherwise, there are small iterations here and there, including TV movies in 1968, 1978, and 1981. So it is exciting that Burdman has brought it back; the company last presented it in 2006.

I saw the show when it was in Central Park by the 103rd St. entrance, winding its way under trees, down paths, and by a pond. (The shows in Carl Schurz Park will be seated in one location, while the scenes will move in Castle Clinton.) Burdman has streamlined it to fit into the company promise of keeping it under two hours, so several characters and some major quotes have been excised (“No legacy is so rich as honesty”; “A young man married is a man that’s marred”), but others are still there (“Love all, trust a few, do wrong to none”; “many a man’s tongue shakes out his master’s undoing”).

The costumes are lovely, the props minimal (blindfolds, a pair of swords, a crown), and the lighting necessary only as the sun sets. (Members of the crew sit in the front with flashlights focused on the speaking actor.) Burdman directs the proceedings with a swift hand, the actors occasionally meandering through the audience. The strong cast is led by superb performances by Clements, who is so appealing as Helena that it’s hard to believe Bertram’s reluctance to wed her, and Montbertrand, who ably shifts between the countess and the widow. Reeves gets well-deserved breakout applause for her singing.

The finale is still troubling, requiring a key suspension of disbelief, but even so, NYCT’s production lives up to the title of the play.

[Mark Rifkin is a Brooklyn-born, Manhattan-based writer and editor; you can follow him on Substack here.]

SOUTHERN DISCOMFORT: LOWCOUNTRY AT THE ATLANTIC

David (Babak Tafti) and Tally (Jodi Balfour) experience a unique first date in Lowcountry (photo by Ahron R. Foster)

LOWCOUNTRY
Atlantic Theater Company, Linda Gross Theater
336 West 20th St. between Eighth & Ninth Aves.
Tuesday – Sunday through July 13, $56.50-$111.50
866-811-4111
atlantictheater.org

Abby Rosebrock’s Lowcountry begins with a lengthy, laborious phone call but ends with a sudden, unexpected explosion. In between, the narrative builds with a pair of unpredictable characters playing a unique game of cat and mouse as Rosebrock and director Jo Bonney slowly lay out breadcrumbs, teasing the audience with key details that emerge at a confounding pace.

It’s 2024, and David (Babak Tafti), a thirtysomething adoptee born in a foreign country, is preparing for what appears to be his first date in many moons. He lives in Moncks Corner, a small town near Charleston, South Carolina, and works at a Waffle House as he tries to put his life back together. “I need to be there for my child,” he declares while talking over the phone to his sponsor, Paul (Keith Kupferer). David is boiling pasta and readying his plain, style-less studio apartment — consisting of a cramped kitchen, a bathroom, a coffee table on an oval rug, an armchair, a bookcase, and unmatched lamps. A brown curtain hangs precariously to hide his bed but it keeps falling down. Paul owns the place and has agreed to let David stay there as long as he follows the rules of his program, which is centered around David not having women in his apartment, not meeting them in parks, and being honest about why he cannot have sex with them.

David, who does not have to wear a GPS cuff anymore, has been divorced for about a year and is fighting for joint custody of his son, Jacob, who is almost eight; Paul, a grandfather, is helping David with his court case. It’s been months since David has seen or spoken with Jacob, instead finding comfort in listening over and over again to voice messages Jacob left him. The protracted, drawn-out phone conversation — which supplies lots of info but keeps the audience at an unfortunate distance — concludes with Paul telling David, “Now when I say text me, you text me the truth” and David responding, “I don’t lie anymore.” Yet nearly everything he’s said to Paul is a lie, a trait that will continue during his date.

He is making dinner for Tally (Jodi Balfour), a woman he met on Tinder who lives in Los Angeles but is visiting her father in the home where she grew up. Shortly after she enters, part of the curtain falls down again, causing David embarrassment. He has trouble fixing it, so she insists she give it a go. “I have a curtain like that!” she proclaims proudly. David is hesitant to let her try, but she ultimately does it without a problem.

Jodi Balfour makes an exciting off-Broadway debut in Lowcountry at the Atlantic (photo by Ahron R. Foster)

It’s an extremely effective scene, depicting David’s intense nervousness and overwhelming worries, matching his ordinary brown and tan unappealing wardrobe, while showing Tally to be a spontaneous, enthusiastic free spirit, enhanced by her low-cut, sexy blue skirt and platform heels. (The costumes are by Sarah Laux and set by Arnulfo Maldonado.) Over spaghetti and wine, they discuss Shakespeare, warlords, porn, confessing, and their deepest fears. “I’m very self-righteous but I have no follow-through,” Tally admits. David asks, “You think it makes me a sociopath that I never cry?”

Every time the subject turns to David’s addiction, he goes out of his way to change the topic, despite her intent curiosity. Meanwhile, she has various secrets of her own that she is not about to share, at least not initially. As the evening continues, the bed seems to be creeping closer and closer.

Rosebrock (Blue Ridge, Different Animals) and Tony nominee Bonney (Cost of Living, Father Comes Home from the Wars) walk that dangerous fine line between manipulation and employing sharp techniques as they release critical plot details little by little, which quickly goes from tantalizing to frustrating. At several points I found myself thinking, “Oh, just tell us already!”

Tafti (Small Mouth Sounds, Othello) manages to make the audience feel some compassion for David, even after the major revelations that explain why he is where he is. It’s a challenging role, and Tafti is up to it. But the show belongs to Balfour; in her off-Broadway debut, the South African actress, best known for Bomb Girls, For All Mankind, and Ted Lasso, she is mesmerizing as Tally, fully embodying this self-demeaning, complex woman who is more than she seems. Balfour commands the audience’s attention, from how she sits in a chair to how she takes off her shoes and drinks wine. It’s a bravura performance that saves the play from getting too caught up in itself, breathing exciting life into the story.

Despite some narrative issues, the ninety-minute Lowcountry ends up being a compelling work with a memorable conclusion that will leave audiences surprised by their reaction to it.

[Mark Rifkin is a Brooklyn-born, Manhattan-based writer and editor; you can follow him on Substack here.]

WORSHIPPING LBJ: XHLOE RICE AND NATASHA ROLAND RETURN TO SOHO PLAYHOUSE WITH REMARKABLE LETTER

Natasha Roland and Xhloe Rice return to SoHo Playhouse with remarkable award-winning production (photo by Morgan McDowell)

A LETTER TO LYNDON B. JOHNSON OR GOD: WHOEVER READS THIS FIRST
SoHo Playhouse
15 Vandam St. between Varick St. & Sixth Ave.
Wednesday – Sunday through June 29, $45.50
www.sohoplayhouse.com
www.xhloeandnatasha.com

Xhloe Rice and Natasha Roland’s A Letter to Lyndon B. Johnson or God: Whoever Reads This First is back for an encore run at SoHo Playhouse, with good reason: It’s one of the best, most innovative and thoroughly satisfying shows of the year.

Rice and Roland met in high school eleven years ago and have been creating unique and inventive two-character plays and short films ever since, offering funny and poignant views of American history and culture and the elusive American dream.

Developing their own form of absurdist physical clown theater, they’ve portrayed Lewis and Clark in a pair of short films, satirized violence in the thirteen-minute Caramel Apples, and, onstage, played a rodeo clown and his shadow who want to become cowboys in And Then the Rodeo Burned Down and scrutinized the desires of 1950s housewives in What If They Ate the Baby?

They shocked the Edinburgh Fringe by winning the Fringe First award in 2022 for Rodeo, 2023 for Baby, and 2024 for Lyndon B. Johnson, their first three works, a feat never before accomplished.

A Letter to Lyndon B. Johnson or God: Whoever Reads This First packs a lot into its fast-moving sixty-five minutes; in addition to starring in the show, Rice and Roland are responsible for the writing, directing, choreography, costumes, set, and sound design, a legitimate DIY effort. Their regular collaborator Angelo Sagnelli is credited with lighting and technical management.

Xhloe Rice and Natasha Roland explore America in A Letter to Lyndon B. Johnson or God: Whoever Reads This First (photo by Morgan McDowell)

Twenty-four audience members sit on the stage in single rows of eight on the two sides and the back; the rest of the audience is in standard seating. The only prop is a large Mudstar radial M/T all-terrain tire with optimized traction; although it was chosen somewhat randomly by Roland’s father, it fits the concept of the show, in which Ace (Roland) and BFF Grasshopper (Rice) share stories of their past in small-town America and their service in Vietnam as they equate President Lyndon B. Johnson with G-d.

Ace is the tough one, from a military family, while Grasshopper is more gentle and vulnerable, raised by his grandmother. They both are barefoot and wearing Boy Scout uniforms, Ace’s covered in many more patches — evoking battle medals — than Grasshopper’s. Their faces, arms, and legs are thick with dirt and grime; Ace also has a bandanna around his head and a bandage on one calf that look like war wounds but, as we learn, aren’t.

“Stay with me,” Grasshopper says at the beginning; we’re not about to go anywhere. Running across the stage, jumping on each other, lying down on the floor, rolling and balancing on the tire, and spit-shaking, Ace and Grasshopper talk about the time Hillbilly had a problem with a high rope swing, relate an evening when their proposed prank of putting snakes in camp counselor Davis’s pillowcase went awry, and prepare for Ace to play the trombone for the president as his train passes through town. Although the trombone scene eerily recalls the 1954 thriller Suddenly, in which Frank Sinatra plays a hit man hired to assassinate the president when his train is scheduled to stop in a small California town, Ace and Grasshopper worship LBJ. They alter the Pledge of Allegiance to include him and offer their own version of the Our Father, as if praying to Johnson and G-d is the same thing; they often swear to Johnson, as if he’s in charge of it all, amid numerous references to religion. Ace has a dream in which his father becomes LBJ.

Throughout the play, Grasshopper tells a multipart fable about “a young boy who lived in a mountain village and . . . wanted nothing more than to be a man.” A witch advises that he must undertake a long, dangerous journey to find a lake filled with leeches that will suck his blood and make him a man; it loosely parallels Ace and Grasshopper’s story as they go from kids to soldiers fighting an ill-defined war in Southeast Asia, one that their hero, LBJ, escalated.

Rice and Roland are utterly charming as Grasshopper and Ace; through direct eye contact with the audience and physically reaching out with various gestures and incorporating the tire, they not only humanize the characters but instantly make them our friends. We all feel a part of the group, enhancing our emotional investment in what happens to them. Their goofing around as kids helps us reminisce about our goofing around as kids:

Ace: I’m what they call “highly decorated.”
Grasshopper: You’re what they call “highly annoying.”
Ace: [puts Grasshopper in a headlock] And what do they call your mom’s brother?
Grasshopper: Uncle! Uncle!

But their faith is tested, as shown in this brief exchange:

Grasshopper: Do you think they’ll let him be president forever?
Ace: They have to.
Grasshopper: He’ll love us.
Ace: He has to.

The immersive sound features nature and music — three Beatles songs play a prominent role, with Rice and Roland performing on that war-movie staple, the harmonica, replacing the words with notes, beginning with “Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da,” which contains the refrain “Ob-la-di, ob-la-da, life goes on, brah / La-la, how their life goes on.” The sound and lighting ultimately explode in a gripping, unforgettable finale.

Winner of SoHo Playhouse’s International Fringe Encore Series Overall Excellence award, A Letter to Lyndon B. Johnson or God: Whoever Reads This First captures the America of the late 1960s as well as today, as politics, religion, and the military become intertwined and the everyday struggles of the common people are completely misunderstood or purposely ignored. Rice and Roland remind us who we were, who we are, and who we still can be. I can’t wait to see where they’ll take us next.

[Mark Rifkin is a Brooklyn-born, Manhattan-based writer and editor; you can follow him on Substack here.]

NO HOPE: THE SINS OF CARAVAGGIO

Playwright Sara Fellini stars as Caravaggio in spit&vigor’s Nec Spe (photo by Nick Thomas)

NEC SPE: THE FINAL CONFESSION OF BRUTE PAINTER CARAVAGGIO
The Players Theatre
115 MacDougal St.
Friday, June 20, and Saturday, June 21, $20-$55, 7:30
www.spitnvigor.com

In past productions, the New York City–based spit&vigor has staged works dealing with such real-life figures from centuries ago as Lord Byron, Percy Bysshe Shelley, and Mary Shelley (Mary’s Little Lamb), Irish madam Dorcas Kelly (The Wake of Dorcas Kelly), the Booth brothers (The Brutes), and Hungarian serial killer Elizabeth Báthory (Blood Countess).

The company is now reaching back to its 2019 show, Nec Spe (No Hope), which was initially presented with Nec Metu (No Fear); the former featured Adam Belvo as Italian Baroque painter Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio, the latter Sara Fellini as his contemporary, Italian Baroque painter Artemisia Lomi Gentileschi. This time around, troupe cofounding artistic director Fellini, who wrote the plays, will take on the role of Caravaggio, and it will be staged at spit&vigor’s tiny baby blackbox space at the Players Theatre, where I saw the excellent Anonymous in February.

In a January 2022 twi-ny talk with Fellini, she noted, “I’ve always been into history. I have trouble relating to the modern world. . . . So, while a lot of the ideas and prejudices of the past are nonsense and based in ignorance and inexperience, I do think there’s a lot to be learned from people who spent all of their time noticing, negotiating, and navigating other human beings.”

Directed by Megan Medley, the play, which deals with art, gender, politics, and murder both in the past and how it relates to what is happening today, will have two more performances, June 20 and 21, and tickets are almost gone, so act fast to check out this unique exploration of an important and influential artist.

[Mark Rifkin is a Brooklyn-born, Manhattan-based writer and editor; you can follow him on Substack here.]