twi-ny recommended events

HOLY MOTORS

Léos Carax’s HOLY MOTORS is a dazzling tribute to Paris, cinema, and the art of storytelling

Léos Carax’s HOLY MOTORS is a dazzling tribute to Paris, cinema, and the art of storytelling

HOLY MOTORS (Léos Carax, 2012)
IFC Center
323 Sixth Ave. at West Third St.
Through Thursday, March 7
212-924-7771
www.ifccenter.com
www.holymotorsfilm.com

French writer-director Léos Carax (Boy Meets Girl, Mauvais Sang) has made only five feature films in his thirty-plus-year career, a sadly low output for such an innovative, talented director, but he has now given birth to his masterpiece, the endlessly intriguing, confusing, and exhilarating Holy Motors. His first film since 1999’s POLA X, the new work is a surreal tale of character and identity, spreading across multiple genres in a series of bizarre, entertaining, and often indecipherable set pieces. Holy Motors opens with Carax himself playing le Dormeur, a man who wakes up and walks through a hidden door in his room and into a movie theater where a packed house, watching King Vidor’s The Crowd, is fast asleep. The focus soon shifts to Carax alter ego Denis Lavant as Monsieur Oscar, a curious character who is being chauffeured around Paris in a white stretch limo driven by the elegant Céline (Édith Scob). Oscar has a list of assignments for the day that involve his putting on elaborate costumes — including revisiting his sewer character from Merde, Carax’s contribution to the 2009 omnibus Tokyo! that also included shorts by Michel Gondry and Bon Joon-ho — and becoming immersed in scenes that might or might not be staged, blurring the lines between fiction and reality within, of course, a completely fictional world to begin with. It is as if each scene is a separate little movie, and indeed, Carax, whose middle name is Oscar, has said that he made Holy Motors after several other projects fell through, so perhaps he has melded many of those ideas into this fabulously abstruse tale that constantly reinvents itself. The film is also a loving tribute to Paris, the cinema, and the art of storytelling, with direct and indirect references to Franz Kafka, E. T. A. Hoffman, Charlie Chaplin, Lon Chaney, Eadweard Muybridge, Georges Franju, and others. (Scob, who starred in Franju’s Eyes Without a Face, at one point even pulls out a mask similar to the one she wore in that classic thriller.) The outstanding cast also features Kylie Minogue, who does indeed get to sing; Eva Mendes as a robotic model; and Michel Piccoli as the mysterious Man with the Birthmark. Holy Motors is finishing up its nearly four-month-long run at the IFC Center on March 7; catch it while you can on the big screen and prepare to be dazzled.

THOMAS SCHÜTTE: UNITED ENEMIES

Thomas Schütte carefully watches installation of “United Enemies” at Central Park entrance on March 2 (photo by twi-ny/mdr)

Thomas Schütte carefully watches installation of “United Enemies” at Central Park entrance on March 2 (photo by twi-ny/mdr)

Scholars’ Gate, Doris C. Freedman Plaza
Central Park entrance, 60th St. & Fifth Ave.
March 5 – August 25
Public Art Fund Talk: Monday, March 4, the New School, 55 West 13th St., $10, 6:30
www.publicartfund.org
united enemies installation slideshow

This weekend, Thomas Schütte’s “United Enemies” was installed on Doris C. Freedman Plaza in front of the Scholars’ Gate entrance to Central Park on Sixtieth St., and the installation itself lent a whole new dynamic to the monumental bronze sculptures. Influenced by political corruption scandals in the Italian government, Schütte has created two pairs of mythical figures bound together forever by tightly knotted rope. These bizarre-looking figures, their faces contorted into impossible forms, resemble twisted versions of Auguste Rodin’s “Monument to Balzac,” their honor long gone. The “United Enemies” series began in the early 1990s when Schütte, who studied with Gerhard Richter at the Düsseldorf Art Academy, started using clay, wood, and wire to compose miniature figures tied together and captured in bell jars. The large-scale statues, which are making their U.S. debut in this presentation of the Public Art Fund, are bold and provocative in their bigger version, calling into question the very nature of celebratory statues and public art. The subjects here don’t seem to enjoy being on display, physically joined to an enemy; imagine a disgraced Republican congressman tied to a dirty Democratic adversary in perpetuity and these are most likely the kinds of faces they’d be making. And they’re not standing on platforms the way most public sculptures are but instead are balancing precipitously on wooden beams that recall the cross. But when the two works were being installed on March 2, with Schütte carefully watching, they took on another dimension. As the works were being lowered into position, the thick cord was wrapped around the necks of three of the men, as if they were being hanged for their crimes; the cord on the fourth man was wound over his mouth, as if he were being censured or had been kidnapped. Schütte will be at the New School on March 4 at 6:30, giving a rare talk that will focus on scale and public sculpture.

STRIPPED/DRESSED: FAYE DRISCOLL

Faye Driscoll’s work-in-progress brings dancers — and audience — together in unique ways (photo by Julie Lemberger)

Faye Driscoll’s work-in-progress brings dancers — and audience — together in unique ways (photo by Julie Lemberger)

92nd St. Y, Buttenwieser Hall
395 Lexington Ave. at 92nd St.
Sunday, March 3, $24, 3:00
212-415-5500
www.92y.org
www.fayedriscoll.com

For her “Stripped/Dressed” presentation at the 92nd St. Y, New York-based choreographer Faye Driscoll changed the general format, with spectacular results. Part of the Harkness Dance Festival, “Stripped/Dressed” invites choreographers to first stage a piece without adornment — no costumes, props, etc. — then discuss the work and show it again, the second time with theatrical accoutrements. Driscoll, whose previous work includes You’re Me, There is so much mad in me, and 837 Venice Blvd, transformed the already intimate Buttenwieser Hall into a warm, friendly gathering, with two rows of seats surrounding all four sides of the center Marley floor. Driscoll first discussed the genesis of her untitled work-in-progress, which examines such themes as mirroring, group ritual, and the interdependence of audience and performer, being sure to walk around the space so she could get close to everyone. Then the five dancers (Giulia Carotenuto, Jeremy Pheiffer, Anna Marie Shogren, Brandon Washington, and Nikki Zialcita) — who had never before performed in public for Driscoll or with one another; they had been hired through auditions in December — began a thirty-five-minute excerpt, wearing regular clothes, with no music and the house lights on throughout, in which they virtually were always in contact with one another as foot touched foot, fingers stroked hair, hands brushed chest, lips kissed neck, elbow banged shoulder, and head popped through legs in a dazzling display of emotion and physicality. The dancers also interacted with the audience via direct eye contact, the exchange of random objects, and touch as well. It’s like the craziest game of Twister you’ve ever seen, except taken to much deeper, provocative, metaphysical levels while, as is Driscoll’s wont, changing many of the rules. The choreographer pointed out that since the work is still in its early phases, some movements are likely to be expanded for the final piece, while others will probably disappear, but audience members after the show could be heard saying that they hope she doesn’t change a thing. The third and final presentation of Driscoll’s unique “Stripped/Dressed” presentation takes place Sunday afternoon at 3:00; curated by Doug Varone, for whom Driscoll previously danced, the series continues March 8-10 with the Liz Gerring Dance Company’s she dreams in code, March 15-17 with Ronald K. Brown/Evidence, a Dance Company’s Gatekeepers, and March 22-24 with the Kate Weare Company’s Garden.

MoMA SELECTS: POV — GRANITO: HOW TO NAIL A DICTATOR

GRANITO shows the power and importance of independent documentary filmmaking

DOCUMENTARY FORTNIGHT 2013: MOMA’S INTERNATIONAL FESTIVAL OF NONFICTION FILM AND MEDIA — GRANITO: HOW TO NAIL A DICTATOR (Pamela Yates, Peter Kinoy & Paco de Onís, 2011)
MoMA Film, Museum of Modern Art
11 West 53rd St. between Fifth & Sixth Aves.
Sunday, March 3, 5:30
Festival runs February 27 – March 4
Tickets: $12, in person only, may be applied to museum admission within thirty days, same-day screenings free with museum admission, available at Film and Media Desk beginning at 9:30 am
212-708-9400
www.moma.org
www.skylightpictures.com

The opening-night selection of the 2011 Human Rights Watch Film Festival, Granito: How to Nail a Dictator is an illuminating, if at times overly self-referential, examination of the power of documentary filmmaking. In 1982, Pamela Yates and Newton Thomas Sigel made When the Mountains Tremble, which told the inside story of civilian massacres of the indigenous Maya people as government forces and guerrilla revolutionaries fought in the jungles of Guatemala; one of the film’s subjects, Rigoberta Menchú, became an international figure and went on to win the Nobel Peace Prize. “When I made that film, I had no idea I was filming in the middle of a genocide,” Yates says at the beginning of Granito. A quarter-century after When the Mountains Tremble, Yates was contacted by lawyer Almudena Bernabeu, who asked Yates to comb through her reels and reels of footage to find evidence of the Guatemalan genocide and help bring charges again dictator Ríos Montt, whom Yates had met with back in 1982. In researching the case, Yates speaks with Menchú, forensic archivist Kate Doyle, journalist liaison Naomi Roht-Arriaza, forensic anthropologist Fredy Peccerelli, Spanish national court judge Santiago Pedraz, victims’ rights leader and genocide survivor Antonio Caba Caba, and Gustavo Meoño, a founding member of the Guerrilla Army of the Poor, each of whom sheds light on the proceedings from various different angles, from digging up bones in mass graves to discussing redacted documents that reveal U.S. involvement in Guatemala. Several of them are risking their lives by both continuing to fight the government and appearing on camera. Granito, which Yates directed with Peter Kinoy and Paco de Onís and was her sixth film to be shown at the Human Rights Watch festival, is a compelling look at how individuals can make a difference. The music is often overly melodramatic, and Yates does seem to like to show herself both in outtakes from her first film and in serious poses in the new film, but its ultimate point overrides those tendencies. Granito is screening at MoMA on March 3 at 5:30 as part of the “MoMA Selects: POV” section of “Documentary Fortnight 2013: MoMA’s International Festival of Nonfiction Film and Media” and will be followed by a Q&A with Yates, de Onís, and Kinoy; the POV portion, which runs February 27 to March 4, celebrates a quarter-century of the award-winning PBS program POV and also includes such films as Marion Lipschutz and Rose Rosenblatt’s The Education of Shelby Knox, Jane Wagner and Tina Di Feliciantonio’s Girls Like Us, Laura Poitras’s The Oath, David Redmon and A. Sabin’s Girl Model. “POV films and filmmakers have been at the center of a golden age of documentary filmmaking,” POV executive producer Simon Kilmurry explained in a statement. “The films in MoMA’s special program not only look back at the first twenty-five years of POV but also look forward. Collectively, they illustrate how vibrant and essential documentaries have become in exploring the human experience.”

THALIA DOCS: 56 UP

Jackie, Lynn, and Sue have been sharing their lives with the public since they were seven years old

56 UP (Michael Apted, 2013)
Symphony Space, Leonard Nimoy Thalia
2537 Broadway at 95th St.
Sunday, March 3 & 10, $14, 1:30
212-864-5400
www.symphonyspace.org
www.firstrunfeatures.com

“The idea of looking at a bunch of people over time and how they evolve, that was a really nifty idea,” Nick says in 56 Up, the eighth film following a group of British men and women every seven years since they were seven in 1964. “It isn’t the picture really of the essence of Nick or Suzy. It’s a picture of everyman. It’s how a person — any person — how they change. It’s not an absolute accurate picture of me, but it’s a picture of somebody, and that’s the value of it.” Michael Apted, who was a researcher on the first film and has directed each one since, meets with thirteen of the original fourteen subjects (Charles has not participated since 21 Up), including Peter, who sat out the previous three films but reappears now in order to promote his band. Apted and editor Kim Horton masterfully blend old and new footage, focusing on one or two subjects at a time, interweaving clips from throughout the years as each person relates where they are today in their life. With age comes greater understanding of not only where they’ve been and what they’ve experienced but of the worth of the series itself, which has been both positive and negative for various individuals, some of whom have found themselves being publicly ridiculed in the media at times. Suzy playfully compares the series to a bad book that she can’t put down, a story she has to finish even though she hates it. The heart of the show has always been an examination of the class-based system in England — the Jesuit motto “Give me the child until he is seven and I will give you the man” has been used in the series since the beginning — and it is fascinating to see how the dreams of the wealthier, more privileged children ended up coming true while those of the poorer kids tended to disintegrate early on.

Director Michael Apted continues his groundbreaking examination of a group of British individuals in 56 UP

Apted, who has also directed such fiction movies as Coal Miner’s Daughter, Gorillas in the Mist, and the James Bond flick The World Is Not Enough, shapes 56 Up in such a way that it works whether the viewer has seen none, some, or all of the previous films, maintaining an involving pace that seems to just fly by despite the film’s 144-minute length. Although it doesn’t pretend to be a scientific study, 56 Up is a fascinating, judgment-free look at the evolution of a group of diverse people that will have viewers examining their own situations in similar ways, exploring their past, present, and future with new insight. After finishing up its extended run at the IFC Center, the film will play March 3 & 10 at 1:30 as part of the ongoing Symphony Space series Thalia Docs.

MARCH MIDNITES — CHICAGO: THE SECOND CITY ON FILM — HENRY: PORTRAIT OF A SERIAL KILLER

MIchael Rooker stars as a troubled murderer in HENRY: PORTRAIT OF A SERIAL KILLER

MIchael Rooker stars as a troubled murderer in HENRY: PORTRAIT OF A SERIAL KILLER

HENRY: PORTRAIT OF A SERIAL KILLER (John McNaughton, 1986)
Nitehawk Cinema
136 Metropolitan Ave. between Berry St. & Wythe Ave.
Friday, March 1, and Saturday, March 2, $65, 12:25 am
718-384-3980
www.nitehawkcinema.com

More than twenty-five years ago, when director John McNaughton (Mad Dog and Glory, Wild Things) was asked by executive producers Malik B. and Waleed B. Ali to make a low-budget horror film, he and cowriter Richard Fire decided to base their tale on the exploits of serial killer Henry Lee Lucas, whose story McNaughton had just seen on 20/20. The result was this creepy, dark, well-paced effort starring Michael Rooker as Henry, a brooding, casual serial killer who can’t quite remember how he murdered his mother. Henry lives in suburban Chicago with ex-con Otis (Tom Towles), whose sexy young sister, Becky (Tracy Arnold), comes to stay with them to get away from her abusive husband. As the relationship among the three of them grows more and more complicated, Henry continues to kill people — and get away with it. The opening tableau of some of Henry’s murder victims — the actual killings aren’t shown in the beginning — is beautifully done, although it also fetishizes violence against women, which is extremely disturbing. (Several of the victims are played by the same woman, Mary Demas, in different wigs.) Henry, which was not released until 1989 because of its graphic content, was nominated for six Independent Spirit Awards in 1990, and Rooker was named Best Actor at the Seattle International Film Festival. The film is screening March 1-2 as part of Nitehawk Cinema’s “March Midnites — Chicago: The Second City on Film” series, which continues March 8-9 with Bernard Rose’s Candyman and March 15-16 with Gary Sherman’s Poltergeist III.

A FIERCE GREEN FIRE

A FIERCE GREEN FIRE

Environmental activists and just plain folk fight the power in A FIERCE GREEN FIRE

A FIERCE GREEN FIRE: THE BATTLE FOR A LIVING PLANET (Mark Kitchell, 2012)
Cinema Village
22 East 12th St. between University Pl. & Fifth Ave.
Opens Friday, March 1
212-924-3363
www.cinemavillage.com
www.afiercegreenfire.com

A lot of documentaries wear their hearts on their sleeves, pushing a specific agenda, but as far as agenda go, A Fierce Green Fire: The Battle for a Living Planet has a pretty good one. Directed by Mark Kitchell (Berkeley in the Sixties), the film serves not only as a history of the environmental movement around the world but also demonstrates how one person can indeed make a difference. But the hundred-minute documentary does itself no favors by using several narrators who are certain to infuriate conservative Republicans and naysayers, ensuring that the film is most likely going to preach only to the converted and not spread its vital message to a more mainstream audience. A Fierce Green Fire is divided into five thematic sections, narrated by Robert Redford, Ashley Judd, Van Jones, Isabel Allende, and Meryl Streep, respectively. Using archival footage and new interviews, Kitchell examines David Brower and the Sierra Club’s fight to prevent a dam project in the Grand Canyon; Lois Gibbs’s struggle to prove the alarming health problems at Love Canal; Paul Watson, Sea Shepherd, and Greenpeace’s mission to save the whales; Chico Mendes’s bravery trying to protect the Amazon rainforest; and the continuing controversy over climate change as seen through the work of such activist organizations as Paul Hawken’s Blessed Unrest. Inspired by Philip Shabecoff’s 1993 book, the film features such talking heads as Whole Earth Catalog publisher Stewart Brand, Earth Day organizer Doug Scott, NRDC founder John Adams, former Sierra Club leader Carl Pope, environmental justice advocate Robert Bullard, Greenpeace cofounder Rex Weyler, WWF conservation biologist Thomas Lovejoy, and legendary naturalist Bill McKibben in addition to Gibbs, Hawken, and Watson. While it’s fascinating to learn that the environmental movement really took off once NASA broadcast images of the earth taken from space, revealing the beautiful fragility of the planet, much of the documentary is told in a fairly stagnant manner, more like an expanded news report than a theatrical film. Still, it shares some intriguing insights and, in celebrating a group of individuals from around the world who fought the power (and sometimes even won), goes a long way in showing that every little step matters.