twi-ny recommended events

SPEAKING OUT ABOUT THE TRUTH: THE BLACK BOX DIARIES OF SHIORI ITO

Shiori Ito (left) shares her heart-wrenching story in tense and gripping new documentary, Black Box Diaries

BLACK BOX DIARIES (Shiori Ito, 2024)
Film Forum
209 West Houston St.
Opens Friday, October 25
212-727-8110
filmforum.org

“All I want to do is talk about the truth,” journalist and rape survivor Shiori Ito says in her shocking, heart-wrenching documentary, Black Box Diaries.

Talking about the truth of sexual violence has become one of the most urgent themes in the twenty-first century. Whether in Hollywood’s “#metoo” movement, the outcry over highly publicized rapes in Indian cities, or stories from the battlefields, women in almost every culture have been driven to make their voices heard, and movies have been a big part of that communication to the world.

For example, in her 2018 film On Her Shoulders, director Alexandria Bombach follows twenty-one-year-old Nadia Murad, one of countless Yazidis who suffered sexual violence at the hands of ISIS in Northern Iraq. Refusing to remain silent, Murad traveled around the globe, sharing her story in order to effect change. “As a girl, I wish I didn’t have to tell the people this happened to me. I mean, I wish it hadn’t happened to me so I wouldn’t have to talk about it,” she explains. “I wish people knew me as an excellent seamstress, as an excellent athlete, as an excellent makeup artist, as an excellent farmer. I didn’t want people to know me as a victim of ISIS terrorism.”

In Black Box Diaries, Ito joins the ranks of women worldwide who take matters into her own hands, making public her claim of rape by Noriyuki Yamaguchi, a leading journalist with close ties to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. Tokyo police and the Japanese government turn their back on her reports, but that doesn’t stop Ito.

“Many people already witnessed what kind of negative reaction I’ve got, and that’s not okay,” Ito says. “I have to be speaking up. I shouldn’t stop speaking, because I don’t want to let people know this made me shut up. No.”

On May 29, 2017, Ito held a press conference in which she boldly described having been sexually assaulted by Yamaguchi at a hotel in 2015 and how, despite DNA evidence, surveillance footage, and an arrest warrant, the case was eventually dropped by prosecutors. Ito, who initially had only limited recall of the details of the attack, went on a mission to expose Japan’s outdated laws concerning sexual violence and to make Yamaguchi pay for his crime, but she is thwarted — and threatened — again and again.

A police investigator believes her but is unwilling to risk his job and help her after he is removed from the case. When Ito points out to an official at the Office for Violence Against Women that only four percent of rape victims file police reports, he answers, “I think [the police] should act according to the appropriate guidelines in place.” Ito adds that there are guidelines that the police do not follow, but the official uncomfortably replies, “We need to continue making efforts to fill in the weak spots. Please excuse my abstract answer.” Representative Michiyoshi Yunoki tries to get Parliament to do something but is ignored by a wall of stone faces that rejects his efforts. And Ito’s own family want her to give up, fearful of the shame it brings them.

Ito records nearly all her interactions with the police, lawyers, government representatives, fellow journalists, and potential witnesses, sometimes secretly. She also makes deeply personal videos on her iPhone in which she discusses her plans and talks openly about how the horrific situation is impacting her daily life and her psyche. With elections coming up and Yamaguchi about to publish an authorized hagiography of his longtime friend Abe, Ito decides to write her own book, even if that results in legal action against her, although she does not want to put any of her supporters or her family in jeopardy. “Bring it on,” she declares as she initiates the #metoo movement in Japan.

Like Murad, who was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2018, Ito was not a born activist; instead, she took what happened to her as an opportunity to fight the status quo, to let people know the truth, and to make things better for other girls and women, through the legal system, police enforcement, and public perception. For example, she is surprised when some women chastise her for telling her story.

As she pursues justice, it is clear how conflicted she is, that none of this comes easy for her as she slowly remembers more about what Yamaguchi did to her that night. Even when she rolls around playfully with her lawyer and a friend, trying to find bits of happiness, she is uncomfortable, knowing that each day leads to new challenges. In her videos, she stares down into the camera, both vulnerable and defiant, confessing what’s in her soul. In a particularly poignant and moving scene, a tear trickles down her cheek, resting on the tip of her nose; she calmly, almost unconsciously brushes it away, a simple but powerful gesture that captures the essence of who she is.

Ito also includes poetic interludes that feature shots of nature accompanied by handwritten text with pertinent facts and such messages as “I keep running, running, can’t stop. I don’t want to face myself.” and “Everyone has a monster in them, but mine didn’t kill me.” Mark degli Antoni’s beautiful piano-based score underlines the tense drama.

Meanwhile, the strength she exhibits in public is intoxicating and inspirational. Her dedication and determination amid all the risks turn the film — which she directed, produced, and partly photographed — into a gripping thriller that never provides any easy answers but displays what the human spirit is capable of.

“I pushed myself to the limit in shooting this documentary. Upon revisiting the hotel where I was raped, I felt the damage I was doing to myself might be too much. But at the same time, my desire to change society and tell this story kept me alive,” she writes in her director’s statement. “Now . . . I can with more objectivity watch the scenes of my breaking down, passing moments of joy and normalcy, and absurd comedy in my novice investigator techniques — and to conceive how they can come together to form our film.”

A must-see documentary whose impact should spread far beyond Japan, Black Box Diaries opens October 25 at Film Forum, with Ito participating in Q&As at the 7:00 screenings on Friday and Saturday.

[Mark Rifkin is a Brooklyn-born, Manhattan-based writer and editor; you can follow him on Substack here.]

GOOD BONES AND FIRM FOUNDATIONS ON AND OFF BROADWAY

Mamoudou Athie, Susan Kelechi Watson, and Khris Davis star in Good Bones at the Public (photo by Joan Marcus)

GOOD BONES
Martinson Hall, the Public Theater
425 Lafayette St. at Astor Pl.
Tuesday through Sunday through October 27, $95
212-539-8500
publictheater.org

According to the Canadian website houseful, “‘Good bones’ refers to the core foundational elements of the home — a steady structure that can withstand time, wear, and elements. A home with good bones typically has a sturdy foundation, structural stability, and a strong roof. A well-staged home can hide imperfections with beautiful rugs, a fresh coat of paint, or features that pull your attention.”

Four current plays that take place primarily in a home struggle with the core foundational elements, with varying results.

Playwright James Ijames and director Saheem Ali follow up their Pulitzer Prize–winning Fat Ham, which ran at the Public’s Anspacher Theater before transferring to Broadway, with Good Bones, continuing at the Public’s Martinson Hall through October 27. Maruti Evans’s set is a skeletal house surrounded by plastic, undergoing renovation in an unidentified American city that itself is experiencing controversial gentrification.

Travis (Mamoudou Athie), who comes from money, and Aisha (Susan Kelechi Watson), who grew up in the projects, are a married couple who have moved back to her neighborhood and are considering having a baby. He is a chef preparing to open a restaurant, and she is working on a new sports complex she believes will vastly improve the community. Their contractor, Earl (Khris Davis), flirts with Aisha, who returns the interest, but when she shares the plans for the complex with him, he sees her as a traitor to her roots.

She explains, “We’re calling it the Jewel. It’s going to be kind of like a little village over there. This neighborhood has been abandoned to decay and atrophy. The Jewel will bring together the best of the old and the new. Will there be change? Yes. But change is the only thing consistent in this life. We have been sowing into this community. We have worked diligently to revitalize this neglected corner of the city. We’re changing this neighborhood for the better.” His quick response: “It’s the death star.”

James Ijames’s Good Bones is in need of further renovation (photo by Joan Marcus)

Remembering how he used to play in the very house he is now working in, Earl tells Aisha, “These houses are sturdy. Shit’s built like a ribcage. The bones are so good. If . . . uh . . . you sit really still in here, you can feel the walls breathing and the floors lifting to meet your feet. That’s why I love these old houses. I get to spend time in a lot of haunted places.”

Good Bones follows in the lofty footsteps of Lorraine Hansberry’s A Raisin in the Sun and Bruce Norris’s Clybourne Park, but it lacks the character development and depth of those two award-winning works. Watson (Eureka Day, Merry Wives) and Athie (The Mystery of Love and Sex) have little chemistry; it might be the relationship between Travis and Aisha that requires renovating, but it’s hard to root for them because their marriage has no firm foundation.

Davis (Fireflies, Sweat) steals the show as the honest, hardworking, well-meaning contractor who has a more realistic view of the world, the only one who can see the ghost in the machine, and Téa Guarino (A Hundred Words for Snow, Antony and Cleopatra) is charming as his daughter, Carmen. But Good Bones needs more work, more than just a fresh coat of paint.

Kate Mulgrew outshines the material in Nancy Harris’s The Beacon at the Irish Rep (photo by Carol Rosegg)

THE BEACON
Irish Repertory Theatre, Francis J. Greenburger Mainstage
132 West Twenty-Second St. between Sixth & Seventh Aves.
Wednesday – Sunday through November 3, $60-$125
212-727-2737
irishrep.org

Obie winner and Emmy nominee Kate Mulgrew excels as an Irish abstract painter renovating her seaside home in Nancy Harris’s The Beacon, making its North American premiere at the Irish Rep through November 3. Mulgrew is Beiv (rhymes with gave), who is transforming her late husband’s cottage into a glass-enclosed space, as if she has nothing to hide — it has been long rumored that she might have had something to do with her spouse’s death.

She is surprised when her son, Colm (Zach Appelman), arrives with his new wife, Bonnie (Ayana Workman), who is a big fan of hers. Colm is surprised when he finds out that one of his old friends, Donal (Sean Bell), is helping with the renovation and has grown close to Beiv, who Colm always calls by her name, never “mom” or “mother.”

At the back of the room is Beiv’s most recent canvas, which is not quite finished yet. Examining it, Bonnie says, “You can really see the female rage. Like I’m instantly getting menstrual blood, the blood of childbirth, genital mutilation, hemorrhaging — pretty much all female suffering. Abortion is in there obviously . . . and repression and shame. But there’s also something really — tender too. Like there, in those softer shades, I see the vulva. And the clitoris, and this really female desire for pleasure, for sexual intimacy but also for like a really fucking explosive orgasm, you know. But yeah. No, it’s powerful. And brutal. And sad too.”

Beiv’s quick response: “It’s a blood orange.”

Of course, it’s actually something in between, and that “in between” is where the play, directed by Marc Atkinson Borrull, find itself stuck, unable to escape from its own trappings.

The Beacon is in need of more structure at the Irish Rep (photo by Carol Rosegg)

Beiv is a complex and fascinating character, superbly portrayed by Mulgrew (The Half-Life of Marie Curie, Tea at Five) with a compelling thread of intrigue. But when she’s not onstage, the narrative drags with didactic dialogue and meandering subplots, some of which feel completely unnecessary, such as the one involving Ray (David Mattar Merten) and Bonnie, although Ray overdramatizes things when he describes the house: “On one hand it looks like an idyllic little artist’s garret. Half-finished charcoal sketches sit scattered on a table. A large oil painting rests on an easel; there’s a huge glass window with sweeping views of the Atlantic. But the crack in the window from a recent break-in suggests another story. A darker story . . . a story of sex and violence and betrayal that’s hung around this cottage for over a decade.”

As always at the Irish Rep, the set, in this case by Colm McNally, is an impressive structure, but the story does not have the requisite good bones. It’s as if Harris and Borrull (Little Gem, Bedbound) knew where they wanted to end up but threw in too much as they get there.

Even the title is wasted on an unimaginative metaphor. Mulgrew herself is a beacon, but alas, in this production, she’s the only one who shines.

Martha Pichey’s Ashes & Ink trap the actors and characters in uncomfortable ways (photo by Thomas Mundell, Mundell Modern Pixels)

ASHES & INK
AMT Theater
354 West Forty-Fifth St. between Eighth & Ninth Aves.
Wednesday – Sunday through November 3, $39-$49
ashesink.ludus.com
www.amttheater.org

“‘Structure.’ Our lives need structure,” Molly (Kathryn Erbe) says early in the New York premiere of Martha Pichey’s Ashes & Ink. It’s a word that’s repeated several times in the play, which itself needs considerable rebuilding.

Running at the AMT Theater through November 3, Ashes & Ink moves between Molly’s apartment in New York City and her boyfriend Leo’s home in the country. Molly is a widow with a vast archive of birdsong she’s recorded and is categorizing with her sister, Bree (Tamara Flannagan); Molly’s teenage son, Quinn (Julian Shatkin), is an addict who has been in and out of rehab and is seeking a career in acting after having made an impact in a few movies. Leo is a widower raising his eight-year-old son, Felix (Rhylee Watson), by himself.

Quinn has once again left rehab, a place called Serenity House, so he can rehearse for his audition to get into the Royal Academy of Dramatic Arts in London. Prepared to do a monologue from Richard II — his father’s name was Richard — he instead does the classic, and obvious, “Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow” soliloquy from MacBeth. The most important phrase is “signifying nothing,” to which he adds, “Nothing. Not a fucking thing.” That goes for the play as well, echoed later by Molly, who opines, “I am so deep inside my sucked dry bones sick and tired. I don’t know how to do this anymore. I don’t even know how to think anymore. I can’t remember anything.”

Tim McMath’s set switches from Molly’s cramped apartment, which resembles a psychiatrist’s office, where Quinn often sits in a chair complaining about his life, and the kitchen of Leo’s country house and under a tree on his property. The actors move the sets themselves; the first time they do it is fresh and exciting, but over the course of fifteen scenes, it grows tiresome, dragging down any pace the show is trying to achieve. For some reason, Molly leaves the window over the fire escape wide open, not the safest thing to do, especially when Quinn is running away from trouble.

Stagnantly directed by Alice Jankell, the play — Pichey’s debut — can’t get out of its own way as subplots turn ever-more ludicrous and the holes in the central story keep expanding. And I couldn’t help but cringe when Tony nominee Erbe (Something Clean, The Speed of Darkness, The Father) had to deliver the following lines: “If somebody told me my little boy would grow up to be an addict, I would’ve spat in their face. Aimed right for their mouth. . . . Take the lid off the pressure cooker, Molly! Watch it plaster the walls with all this gummy smelly stuff. Put your nose up to it, take a good whiff of this shit, this mix of ‘Could’ve done this,’ ‘Should’ve known that.’”

Without any kind of firm foundation, Ashes & Ink fails the smell test, among others.

Sisters Gloria (Leanne Best), Ruby (Ophelia Lovibond), Jill (Helena Wilson), and Joan (Laura Donnelly) reunite as their mother lies on her deathbed in The Hills of California (photo by Joan Marcus)

THE HILLS OF CALIFORNIA
Broadhurst Theatre
235 West 44th St. between Broadway & Eighth Ave.
Tuesday – Sunday through December 22, $58-$351
thehillsofcalifornia.com

Rob Howell’s magnificent multilevel set for Jez Butterworth’s new play, The Hills of California, is a character unto itself, an Escher-like maze of rooms and staircases that rise into a mystical darkness. The main floor switches between 1955 and 1976 at a family-run Victorian guesthouse on the outskirts of the seaside resort town of Blackpool on the Irish Sea, providing a firm foundation for the gripping, if overburdened, narrative.

In 1976, sisters Gloria (Leanne Best), Ruby (Ophelia Lovibond), and Jill (Helena Wilson) have gathered at the fading Seaview Luxury Guesthouse and Spa because their mother, Veronica Webb, is dying in a room upstairs; they are waiting for their fourth sister, Joan (Laura Donnelly), who has not stepped foot in the house for twenty years, living in America. They are in what once was the private kitchen but is now a tiki bar with a one-armed bandit and broken jukebox that represent the siblings’ once-promising career. Their mother’s nurse, Penny (Ta’Rea Campbell), has offered the sisters the opportunity to bring in a doctor to end Veronica’s pain, but they don’t want to make any critical decisions until Joan arrives, something Gloria believes is highly unlikely.

“Times like these you find out who a body is. But go on. Stick up for her,” Gloria says sharply to Jill, who has spent her life taking care of the guesthouse and Veronica and is sure that Joan is on her way, exclaiming, “Well, I’m sorry. But it’s not Silly Jilly head-in-the-clouds, nor sticking up for no one. I know my sister. If Joan says she’s coming, she’s coming. There. I’ve said it.”

In 1955, single mother Veronica (Donnelly) is training young Gloria (Nancy Allsop), Ruby (Sophia Ally), Jill (Nicola Turner), and Joan (McDonnell) to become the next Andrews Sisters, rehearsing Johnny Mercer’s 1948 hit “The Hills of California,” which features the lines “The hills of California will give ya a start / I guess I better warn ya cuz you’ll lose your heart / You’ll settle down forever and never stray from the view / The hills of California are waiting for you.”

“What is a song?” Veronica asks, answering, “A song is a place to be. Somewhere you can live. And in that place, there are no walls. No boundaries. No locks. No keys. You can go anywhere.” A song is its own kind of structure, its own kind of home, meant to bring people together, but in The Hills of California, it tears a family apart.

Veronica Webb (Laura Donnelly) is a controlling British stage mother in Jez Butterworth’s The Hills of California (photo by Joan Marcus)

Tony winner Butterworth (The River, Jerusalem) and Oscar, Tony, and Olivier-winning director Sam Mendes (The Lehman Trilogy, Cabaret) previously teamed up on The Ferryman, which won four Tonys and boasted an ensemble of nearly three dozen performers including covers. The Hills of California is overstocked with minor male characters who disappear into the woodwork, even Luther St. John (David Wilson Barnes), who is involved in a key scene that influences the girls’ future and their relationship with their mother.

About fifteen minutes have been cut from the original three-hour London production and the early previews on Broadway, leaving some gaps in the narrative, along with several moments that feel extraneous, such as when Veronica forces a lodger (Richard Short) to take the long way home, barring him from the shortcut through the kitchen. But when the story focuses on the mother and her daughters, in both time periods, the play finds its foundation, with sharp, poignant dialogue, lovely music by Nick Powell, and pinpoint choreography by Ellen Kane.

Donnelly, who has appeared in several plays written by Butterworth, her partner (they have two children together), is whip-smart as Veronica, a controlling stage mother who recalls Rose Hovick in Gypsy, currently played by Audra McDonald right next door at the Majestic. (On the other side is another show about a mother and daughter and music, Hell’s Kitchen.)

America is not referenced just in the song; the rooms in the guesthouse are named after such US states as Colorado, Alabama, Indiana, Minnesota, and Mississippi, where the critical event happens in 1955 and where Veronica is dying in 1976, reminding the audience that this kind of tale can happen anywhere.

In her 2016 poem “Good Bones,” British actress Maggie Smith, who passed away in September at the age of eighty-nine, writes, “Any decent realtor, / walking you through a real shithole, chirps on / about good bones: This place could be beautiful, / right? You could make this place beautiful.” Even with its occasional skeletal forays, The Hills of California has good bones, filled with a glorious beauty.

[Mark Rifkin is a Brooklyn-born, Manhattan-based writer and editor; you can follow him on Substack here.]

THE SACRIFICE: 4K RESTORATION

Brand-new 4K restoration of Andrei Tarkovsky’s final film, The Sacrifice, opens October 25 at Film Forum

THE SACRIFICE (OFFRET) (Andrei Tarkovsky, 1986)
Film Forum
209 West Houston St.
October 25 – November 7
212-727-8110
www.filmforum.org
kinolorber.com

Andrei Tarkovsky’s final film, The Sacrifice, completed shortly before his death in 1986 of cancer at the age of fifty-four, serves as a glorious microcosm of his career, exploring art, faith, ritual, devotion, and humanity in uniquely cinematic ways — and you can now see it in a brand-new 4K restoration by the Swedish Film Institute at Film Forum, opening October 25. Made in Sweden, the film, which won three awards at Cannes (among many other honors), has many Bergmanesque qualities: Bergman’s longtime cinematographer, Sven Nykvist, shot the film; the production designer is Anna Asp, who won an Oscar for her work on Fanny and Alexander; Bergman’s son Daniel served as a camera assistant; and the star is Erland Josephson, who appeared in ten Bergman films as well as Tarkovsky’s previous feature, the Italy-set Nostalghia.

Josephson plays Alexander, a retired professor and former actor living in the country with his wife, the cold Adelaide (Susan Fleetwood), his stepdaughter, Marta (Filippa Franzén), and young son, Little Man (Tommy Kjellqvist), who cannot speak after a recent throat operation. It is Alexander’s birthday, and the family doctor, Victor (Sven Wollter), has come to visit, along with the odd local postman, Otto (Allan Edwall), who explains, “I collect incidents. Things that are unexplainable but true.” Also on hand are the two maids, Maria (Guðrún Gísladóttir), who Otto believes is a witch, and Julia (Valérie Mairesse). Alexander states early on that he has no relationship with God, but when a nuclear holocaust threatens, he suddenly gets down on the floor and prays, offering to sacrifice whatever it takes in order for him to survive, leading to a chaotic conclusion that is part slapstick, part utter desperation.

Although it has a more focused, direct narrative than most of Tarkovsky’s other works, The Sacrifice is far from a conventional story. Tarkovsky has written that it “is a parable. The significant events it contains can be interpreted in more than one way. . . . A great many producers eschew auteur films because they see cinema not as art but as a means of making money: the celluloid strip becomes a commodity. In that sense The Sacrifice is, amongst other things, a repudiation of commercial cinema. My film is not intended to support or refute particular ideas, or to make a case for this or that way of life. What I wanted was to pose questions and demonstrate problems that go to the very heart of our lives, and thus to bring the audience back to the dormant, parched sources of our existence. Pictures, visual images, are far better able to achieve that end than any words.”

The film is filled with gorgeous visual images, beautiful shots of vast landscapes, of open doorways in stark interiors, of mirrors and windows, of Alexander and Little Man planting a dead tree by the edge of the ocean, and spoken language is often kept to a minimum, saved for philosophical discussions of God, Nietzsche, and home. Several scenes are filmed in long, continuous shots, lasting from six minutes to more than nine, heightening both the reality and the surrealism of the tale, which includes black-and-white memories, floating characters, and actors staring directly into the camera. Although Christianity plays a key role in the film — Tarkovsky considered himself a religious man, and the opening credits are shown over a close-up of Leonardo da Vinci’s Adoration of the Magi — the redemption that Alexander is after is a profoundly spiritual and, critically, a most human one as he searches for truth and hope amid potential annihilation.

[Mark Rifkin is a Brooklyn-born, Manhattan-based writer and editor; you can follow him on Substack here.]

THE PHANTOM OF ESTER KRUMBACHOVÁ

Valerie and Her Week of Wonders

Valerie (Jaroslava Schallerová) comes of age rather early in Valerie and Her Week of Wonders

VALERIE AND HER WEEK OF WONDERS (VALERIE A TÝDEN DIVŮ) (Jaromil Jireš, 1970)
Metrograph
7 Ludlow St. between Canal & Hester Sts.
Friday October 25, 6:50
Saturday October 26, 5:45
Series runs October 28-27
212-660-0312
metrograph.com

Metrograph’s “The Phantom of Ester Krumbachová” series, presented in collaboration with the Czech Center New York, pays tribute to the career of writer, director, set designer, and costume designer Ester Krumbachová (1923–96), who was blacklisted by the communist government for her work. The ten-day festival consists of seven films by such directors as Otakar Vávra (Witchhammer), Věra Chytilová (Fruit of Paradise, Daisies), and Jan Němec (Diamonds of the Night, Party and the Guests), Krumbachová’s onetime husband and muse, in addition to Krumbachová’s Murdering the Devil, the only film she directed. On October 25 and 26, Jaromil Jireš’s Valerie and Her Week of Wonders will be shown, an extremely strange, totally hypnotic film on which Krumbachová served as writer and production designer. (Producer and curator Irena Kovarova will introduce the latter screening.)

Based on the 1945 Gothic novel by Vítězslav Nezval (which was written ten years earlier), Valerie is a dreamy adult fairy tale, inspired by “Little Red Riding Hood,” “Alice in Wonderland,” and other fables, about the coming of age of Valerie, a nymphette played by thirteen-year-old Jaroslava Schallerová in her film debut. Valerie lives with her icy, regal grandmother, Elsa (Helena Anýzová), in a remote village, where visiting missionaries and actors are cause for celebration. In addition, Valerie’s best friend, Hedvika (Alena Stojáková), is being forced to marry a man she doesn’t love. Valerie, who is in possession of magic earrings, is being courted by the bespectacled, bookish Eaglet (Petr Kopriva) as well as the Constable (Jirí Prýmek), who just happens to be an evil, ugly vampire who has a mysterious past with Elsa. Also showing an untoward interest in the virginal Valerie is the local priest, Gracián (Jan Klusák).

But don’t get too caught up in the hallucinatory narrative, which usually makes little sense. Characters’ motivations are inconsistent and confusing (especially as Jireš delves deeper and deeper into Valerie’s unconscious), plot points come and go with no explanation, and the spare dialogue is often random and inconsequential. And don’t try too hard looking for references to the Prague Spring, colonialism, and communism; just trust that they’re in there. Instead, let yourself luxuriate in Jan Curík’s lush imagery, Lubos Fiser and Jan Klusák’s Baroque score, Krumbachová’s enchanting production design, and Jan Oliva’s weirdly wonderful art direction. Valerie’s white bedroom is enchantingly surreal, a private world in a darkly magical Medieval land beset by incest, rape, fire, murder, self-flagellation, paganism, and monsters, everything dripping with blood and sex. No, this is most definitely not a fantasia for kids.

[Mark Rifkin is a Brooklyn-born, Manhattan-based writer and editor; you can follow him on Substack here.]

IMMERSIVE DREAM THEATER: REIMAGINING NIGHTMARES IN MULTIMEDIA MUSEUM INSTALLATIONS

“Music Box” is one of fifteen multimedia installations at Mercer Labs inspired by Roy Nachum’s nightmares (photo by twi-ny/mdr)

DARK MATTER: NIGHTMARE BEFORE MIDNIGHT
Mercer Labs Museum of Art and Technology
21 Dey St. at Cortland St.
Through October 30, $46-$52
mercerlabs.com
roynachum.com
dark matter online slideshowthe dragon

“Everyone knows two things about dreams, namely 1) other people’s dreams are dull and 2) they’re going to tell you about them anyway. And as they burble on,” Black Mirror co-showrunner Charlie Brooker wrote in the Guardian in 2013, “it’s hard not to fall asleep and start dreaming yourself.”

Multidisciplinary experimental artist Roy Nachum, who was born in Jerusalem, lives in New York City, and works in New York and Italy, doesn’t shy away from sharing his dreams in the multimedia exhibition “Dark Matter: Nightmare Before Midnight,” continuing through October 30 at Mercer Labs Museum of Art and Technology, the downtown institution he cofounded with Michael Cayre that opened in February. The immersive, interactive exhibit features fifteen rooms, each containing audiovisual stimuli with images that range from fun and fancy-free to strange and horrific. In a statement, Nachum elucidates, “‘Dark Matter’ examines the role of darkness in art history. Revealing how the subconscious uncertainty and the unknown has shaped artistic movements and expressed cultural anxieties across time. The exhibition is a mirror to our fears and fascinations with the unknown.”

Visitors begin their journey with “The Window,” a circle on the ceiling that morphs into a trompe l’oeil dome opening into a swirl of cool shapes and colors, set to grand music, that practically sucks you in like an alien ship beaming you up. In “The Cave,” short films of a mysterious monkey appear amid a landscape of pink flowers (and a bar where you can purchase specially concocted nonalcoholic drinks). In “Archetype,” a robotic machine endlessly rakes sand, reminiscent of Sun Yuan and Peng Yu’s Can’t Help Myself but more meditative than dystopian. In “The Game,” people can play chess with large-scale creature-pieces on a board that emits screams and other loud noises as you walk across the squares. In “The Map,” you can sit on central cushions or on one of several swings as a barrage of sound and images pour over the walls, floor, and ceiling.

“Infinite” might make you dizzy with its twisting, mirrored images of snakes and innards. “Freedom” is a peaceful respite. “The Dragon” is like an endless zone of swirling shapes and colors. “Music Box” is a giant gold music box in a mirrored room, the central figure wearing a crown like those that form a tower in Nachum’s 2016 Kings statue that reigns in front of a Tribeca condo. “Ecosystem” unfurls at your feet, depicting a cinematic chase and, well, I’m not quite sure what to call some of the other fantastical adventures.

In “Ball Pond,” visitors can slide into a pond of little balls. “Pneumatic Transmission” is a futuristic mirrored room of interweaving tubes that could be a scene from Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey. “Drawing Station” gives everyone the chance to see their own sketch appear on a projection of a spinning skull. (Around the corner are a few kiosks where you can create images using your finger on a screen, but beware the hellish monster.) And in “4DSound,” Nachum’s personal favorite, a dreamlike enclsure appearing to be floating offers a soothing soundscape; visitors are encouraged to lie down on the floor and let it all envelop them.

In 2015, on BBC Radio 4’s Four Thought, interdisciplinary historian Dr. Shane McCorristine said, “The ubiquity of the Freudian model of dreams as repressed wish-fulfilments . . . played a key role in making people think that dreams were internal, private matters, and not the kind of thing you discussed with others.” Nachum must not be a Freudian.

While “Dark Matter” might be Instagram-friendly in the way that immersive exhibitions of beloved artists (van Gogh, Klimt, Monet) are, it is a deeper experience. Don’t just keep your phone out taking pictures and video but try to feel each installation. Like your own dreams, some will titillate you, some frustrate you, some bewilder you, some bore you, and others delight you. You might not want to sit down with Nachum and listen to him tell you his dreams and nightmares and try to interpret them as repressed wish-fulfilments — he can’t sleep very well — but for an hour or so, it’s worth walking through the wild and unpredictable internal scenarios that haunt him night after night and now are public, for all of us to encounter.

[Mark Rifkin is a Brooklyn-born, Manhattan-based writer and editor; you can follow him on Substack here.]

DEEP HISTORY

David Finnigan explores climate change and the past and future of humanity in multimedia solo show (photo by Joan Marcus)

DEEP HISTORY
The Shiva Theater at the Public Theater
425 Lafayette St.
Tuesday – Sunday through November 10, $75-$175
212-539-8500
publictheater.org

“Humanity didn’t come this far to only come this far,” David Finnigan says near the beginning of his one-man show Deep History, continuing at the Public’s Shiva Theater through November 10.

Finnigan, who hails from Ngunnawal country in Australia, has been investigating climate change for more than a decade in such plays as the controversial Kill Climate Deniers and Scenes from the Climate Era. He is also a climate risk consultant who works with the World Bank and sustainable finance NGOs, and his father is a leading micro-meteorologist who studies windflow over plant canopies. As he relates early in Deep History — which was called You’re Safe Til 2024: Deep History in previous iterations — his father is also a victim of climate change; he was a record-breaking mountain climber who suffered serious injuries in a horrific fall that occurred as a result of melting ice caps.

Across a well-paced seventy minutes, Finnigan takes the audience on a trip through six key moments in the development of humanity that brought us to where we are today, starting seventy-five thousand years ago, and relates them to the devastating 2019–20 Australian bush fires, specifically focusing on his best friend Jack Lloyd’s attempts to protect his family during Christmas week as fires surge around them. A barefooted Finnigan goes back and forth between two tables, one with a laptop with which he controls the light and sound and projects photos and videos on a large screen, and the other with a smartphone camera recording sugar pouring through a funnel, which builds a small mountain with each grain representing one hundred human beings.

Finnigan also tracks the soul of an imaginary woman who experiences all six turning points, told in poetic monologues accompanied by videos of the natural world. “She’s walking. / Under a dark sky, dark even in the day / She walks west across the grasslands,” he says. “The trick is to not think about it / just focus on what’s in front of her / and don’t think about / her little child, dead / her parents, dead / everyone dead / all gone, all ghosts.” He explains how his father considers humans to be only at their adolescent stage, his dad telling him, “If you compare the life of the human species to a human individual — you can see that this crisis we’re going into, the climate era, is just the next challenge to be survived for us to make it through to adulthood.”

Thus, Finnigan is not predicting doom and gloom and a coming apocalypse that will destroy the planet no matter what we do; instead, he remains positive, facing tomorrow and beyond with optimism. He states, “Look — we can decide the lessons we take from the past. . . . We choose what we take with us from what’s gone before.”

David Finnigan tracks six critical moments in time in Deep History at the Public (photo by Joan Marcus)

Directed by Annette Mees with video design by Hayley Egan and music by Reuben Ingall, who figures in the narrative, Deep History can at times feel like a TED talk; in fact, at a fortieth anniversary TED Conference in Vancouver in April, Finnigan delivered the ten-minute lecture “A Controversial Play — and What It Taught Me About the Psychology of Climate.” But onstage at the Shiva Theater, Finnigan is warm and personable, making direct eye contact with everyone in the audience, inviting them into this critically important story that he laces with charm and humor. He playfully spins around when he is switching from 2019 David to 2024 David, and he drops the marker he uses to update a chart that shares insight from each of the six key moments, the sharp noise ensuring we are paying attention.

Finnigan (Are You Ready to Take the Law into Your Own Hands, 44 Sex Acts in One Week) is relaxed and engaging before the show as well, hanging around the seating area, saying hello to people; I spoke with him briefly about my 2018–19 trip to Australia and diving at the Great Barrier Reef, which is in danger because of global warming. He’s also in the midst of a major project with the Public, The Seventh Assessment: A History of Climate Change in Seven Dance Parties, which is scheduled for 2028, when the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change will release its next comprehensive synthesis report.

In addition, the Public has partnered with Broadway Green Alliance and Wearable Collections to set up places in the lobby where visitors can reuse, recycle, and repurpose clothing and shoes.

Can art make a difference in the future of the planet, especially if it incorporates actual science? It certainly can’t hurt, as Finnigan ably demonstrates.

[Mark Rifkin is a Brooklyn-born, Manhattan-based writer and editor; you can follow him on Substack here.]

THE LIFE AND TIMES OF A RED HOOK INSTITUTION

Four actors share the history of Red Hook and Sunny’s Bar on board a historic barge in The Wind and the Rain (photo by Maria Baranova)

THE WIND AND THE RAIN: A STORY ABOUT SUNNY’S BAR
Lehigh Valley Railroad Barge No. 79
Sunny’s Bar
Conover Street pier, Red Hook
Wednesday – Sunday through October 27, $25 general admission – $45 VIP
engardearts.org
vineyardtheatre.org

At the beginning of writer Sarah Gancher and director Jared Mezzocchi’s wonderful site-specific play The Wind and the Rain: A story about Sunny’s Bar, actor Paco Tolson asks if anyone is new to Red Hook. The night I was there, only a few hands went up. “You made it! Welcome!” he says.

There was a time not long ago when nearly everyone in the audience would have raised their hands. Red Hook has changed, and the show provides an entertaining and innovative look at that metamorphosis through the slightly warped lens of Sunny’s Bar.

The multimedia production starts on board the historic 1914 Lehigh Valley No. 79 wooden railroad barge, which is docked on Conover St. in Red Hook and houses the Waterfront Museum, which is run by barge owner David Sharps. The audience sits in two rows on three sides of the staging area, where Tolson, Jennifer Regan, Pete Simpson, and Jen Tullock share the history of the neighborhood and, specifically, Sunny’s Bar, which is across the street. Simpson points out early on, “Some of what you see tonight is based on interviews. Some is based on research. Some is fictionalized. Some is totally made up.” He adds, “It’s a big story. It covers hundreds of years and thousands of people. And there’s just four of us, so we do need your help. We need you to be our voices of the past.”

The Wind and the Rain is an immersive, participatory show; members of the audience read text projected on a front screen and the walls, and some are asked to stand up and play a role for a minute or two. Although it’s made clear that no one will be forced to do anything they don’t want to do, the play works best when the audience is fully engaged. (Be sure to be ready when the shoe comes to you.)

Gancher takes us back through desolate periods with wild dogs roaming the grounds, police corruption and protection rackets, gambling and brothels, and Prohibition as well as when Red Hook was a busy port, an English fishing village, a Dutch community, Lenape territory, and part of a massive glacier. “How do you write a story about time?” Regan asks. In this case, they focus on the last hundred years, featuring a wide range of intriguing characters centered around the impact Hurricane Sandy had on the bar and the relationship between Sunny (Simpson) and his partner, Tone Johansen (Tullock), pronounced “tuna.”

Sunny was raised in Red Hook, traveled to India to study with a guru, tried his hand at acting, then became an abstract painter before opening the bar in 1997. Tone was born on a remote Norwegian island, where her family had little and she was not exposed to the outside world. When they discuss their past, flashback scenes introduce us to Sunny’s grandparents Antonio and Angelina Balzano, who bought the bar in 1907, his parents Ralph and Josephine, his brother Frank, his cousin Gina Fazzabini, hipster bartender Francis, Barzano delivery boy Romeo and his brother Dominic, the hardworking Teresa, and others, splendidly portrayed by the four-person cast through quick changes as they shift four rolling tables around. (Marcelo Martínez Garcia’s set also includes family photos hung on the walls; the costumes are by Mika Eubanks, with stark lighting by Amith Chandrashaker, immersive sound by Jane Shaw, and superb video and projections by Paul Deziel.)

Battling family money squabbles, natural disasters, and Sunny’s health issues and wandering eye, Tone does everything she can to keep the bar running against improbable odds.

Sunny (Pete Simpson) and Tone (Jen Tullock) take stock of their lives in multimedia participatory site-specific play (photo by Maria Baranova)

Obie winners Gancher (The Place We Built, The Lucky Ones) and Mezzocchi (On the Beauty of Loss) previously collaborated on Russian Troll Farm: A Workplace Comedy, which was a streaming hit during the pandemic before being performed IRL at the Vineyard, which teamed up with Anne Hamburger’s site-specific specialists En Garde Arts on The Wind and the Rain. Gancher and Mezzocci make terrific use of the dark, intimate space, keeping the strong ensemble — which has an infectious improvisatory feel, like a jazz band — on the move and the audience involved, never getting bogged down in staid exposition.

Obie winner Simpson (Is This a Room, Infinite Life) does an uncanny job capturing the essence of Sunny, a magnetic figure who helped revivify Red Hook. Tullock (On the Head of a Pin, You Shall Inherit the Earth!) is powerful as the serious Tone, an unstoppable force who is on a mission. Regan (Born Yesterday, How I Learned to Drive) and Tolson (Vietgone, The Knight of the Burning Pestle) are excellent switching between multiple roles and addressing the audience directly, breaking the fourth wall regularly.

Throughout the show, an Americana roots band led by multi-instrumentalist Pete Lanctot plays such traditional tunes as “I Saw the Light” and “Where the Soul of Man Never Dies” with a rotating roster of musicians from Sunny’s; the night I attended, Lanctot was joined by Adam Winski on banjo, Sarah Klein on ukulele, and Alex Deane on fiddle.

The two-hour play (plus intermission) concludes with a group walk to Sunny’s Bar, accompanied by further narrative delivered over headphones and spectacular projections, resulting in a grand finale, with VIP ticket holders congregating at outside tables in the back to continue a memorable experience that can only happen in Red Hook.

[Mark Rifkin is a Brooklyn-born, Manhattan-based writer and editor; you can follow him on Substack here.]